FireAsf 🔥
![]() [ Upstream commit e28acc9c1ccfcb24c08e020828f69d0a915b06ae ] Accessing `mr_table->mfc_cache_list` is protected by an RCU lock. In the following code flow, the RCU read lock is not held, causing the following error when `RCU_PROVE` is not held. The same problem might show up in the IPv6 code path. 6.12.0-rc5-kbuilder-01145-gbac17284bdcb #33 Tainted: G E N ----------------------------- net/ipv4/ipmr_base.c:313 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!! rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 2 locks held by RetransmitAggre/3519: #0: ffff88816188c6c0 (nlk_cb_mutex-ROUTE){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __netlink_dump_start+0x8a/0x290 #1: ffffffff83fcf7a8 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: rtnl_dumpit+0x6b/0x90 stack backtrace: lockdep_rcu_suspicious mr_table_dump ipmr_rtm_dumproute rtnl_dump_all rtnl_dumpit netlink_dump __netlink_dump_start rtnetlink_rcv_msg netlink_rcv_skb netlink_unicast netlink_sendmsg This is not a problem per see, since the RTNL lock is held here, so, it is safe to iterate in the list without the RCU read lock, as suggested by Eric. To alleviate the concern, modify the code to use list_for_each_entry_rcu() with the RTNL-held argument. The annotation will raise an error only if RTNL or RCU read lock are missing during iteration, signaling a legitimate problem, otherwise it will avoid this false positive. This will solve the IPv6 case as well, since ip6mr_rtm_dumproute() calls this function as well. Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org> Reviewed-by: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241108-ipmr_rcu-v2-1-c718998e209b@debian.org Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> |
||
---|---|---|
.github/workflows | ||
android | ||
arch | ||
block | ||
certs | ||
crypto | ||
Documentation | ||
drivers | ||
firmware/tsp_goodix | ||
fs | ||
gki | ||
include | ||
init | ||
io_uring | ||
ipc | ||
kernel | ||
kernel_build | ||
KernelSU@b766b98513 | ||
kunitconfigs | ||
lib | ||
LICENSES | ||
mm | ||
net | ||
samples | ||
scripts | ||
security | ||
sound | ||
test | ||
tools | ||
usr | ||
virt | ||
build.config.aarch64 | ||
build.config.allmodconfig | ||
build.config.allmodconfig.aarch64 | ||
build.config.allmodconfig.arm | ||
build.config.allmodconfig.x86_64 | ||
build.config.amlogic | ||
build.config.arm | ||
build.config.common | ||
build.config.db845c | ||
build.config.erd8825_a25_s | ||
build.config.erd8825_s | ||
build.config.erd9925_evt0_s | ||
build.config.erd9925_evt0_s5300_s | ||
build.config.erd9925_s | ||
build.config.gki | ||
build.config.gki-debug.aarch64 | ||
build.config.gki-debug.x86_64 | ||
build.config.gki.aarch64 | ||
build.config.gki.aarch64.fips140 | ||
build.config.gki.aarch64.fips140_eval_testing | ||
build.config.gki.x86_64 | ||
build.config.gki_kasan | ||
build.config.gki_kasan.aarch64 | ||
build.config.gki_kasan.x86_64 | ||
build.config.gki_kprobes | ||
build.config.gki_kprobes.aarch64 | ||
build.config.gki_kprobes.x86_64 | ||
build.config.hikey960 | ||
build.config.khwasan | ||
build.config.mcd | ||
build.config.rockchip | ||
build.config.universal2100_s | ||
build.config.universal8825_s | ||
build.config.universal9925_evt0_s | ||
build.config.universal9925_s | ||
build.config.x86_64 | ||
build.sh | ||
COPYING | ||
CREDITS | ||
Kbuild | ||
Kconfig | ||
linux-stable.sh | ||
MAINTAINERS | ||
Makefile | ||
OWNERS | ||
README | ||
README.md | ||
vendor_boot_module_order_exynos2100.cfg | ||
vendor_boot_module_order_s5e8825.cfg | ||
vendor_boot_module_order_s5e9925.cfg | ||
vendor_module_list_s5e8825.cfg | ||
vendor_module_list_s5e9925.cfg | ||
vendor_module_list_s5e9925_b0s.cfg | ||
vendor_module_list_s5e9925_g0s.cfg | ||
vendor_module_list_s5e9925_r0s.cfg |
How do I submit patches to Android Common Kernels
-
BEST: Make all of your changes to upstream Linux. If appropriate, backport to the stable releases. These patches will be merged automatically in the corresponding common kernels. If the patch is already in upstream Linux, post a backport of the patch that conforms to the patch requirements below.
- Do not send patches upstream that contain only symbol exports. To be considered for upstream Linux,
additions of
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL()
require an in-tree modular driver that uses the symbol -- so include the new driver or changes to an existing driver in the same patchset as the export. - When sending patches upstream, the commit message must contain a clear case for why the patch is needed and beneficial to the community. Enabling out-of-tree drivers or functionality is not not a persuasive case.
- Do not send patches upstream that contain only symbol exports. To be considered for upstream Linux,
additions of
-
LESS GOOD: Develop your patches out-of-tree (from an upstream Linux point-of-view). Unless these are fixing an Android-specific bug, these are very unlikely to be accepted unless they have been coordinated with kernel-team@android.com. If you want to proceed, post a patch that conforms to the patch requirements below.
Common Kernel patch requirements
- All patches must conform to the Linux kernel coding standards and pass
script/checkpatch.pl
- Patches shall not break gki_defconfig or allmodconfig builds for arm, arm64, x86, x86_64 architectures (see https://source.android.com/setup/build/building-kernels)
- If the patch is not merged from an upstream branch, the subject must be tagged with the type of patch:
UPSTREAM:
,BACKPORT:
,FROMGIT:
,FROMLIST:
, orANDROID:
. - All patches must have a
Change-Id:
tag (see https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/Documentation/user-changeid.html) - If an Android bug has been assigned, there must be a
Bug:
tag. - All patches must have a
Signed-off-by:
tag by the author and the submitter
Additional requirements are listed below based on patch type
Requirements for backports from mainline Linux: UPSTREAM:
, BACKPORT:
- If the patch is a cherry-pick from Linux mainline with no changes at all
- tag the patch subject with
UPSTREAM:
. - add upstream commit information with a
(cherry picked from commit ...)
line - Example:
- if the upstream commit message is
- tag the patch subject with
important patch from upstream
This is the detailed description of the important patch
Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>
- then Joe Smith would upload the patch for the common kernel as
UPSTREAM: important patch from upstream
This is the detailed description of the important patch
Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>
Bug: 135791357
Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
(cherry picked from commit c31e73121f4c1ec41143423ac6ce3ce6dafdcec1)
Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>
- If the patch requires any changes from the upstream version, tag the patch with
BACKPORT:
instead ofUPSTREAM:
.- use the same tags as
UPSTREAM:
- add comments about the changes under the
(cherry picked from commit ...)
line - Example:
- use the same tags as
BACKPORT: important patch from upstream
This is the detailed description of the important patch
Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>
Bug: 135791357
Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
(cherry picked from commit c31e73121f4c1ec41143423ac6ce3ce6dafdcec1)
[joe: Resolved minor conflict in drivers/foo/bar.c ]
Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>
Requirements for other backports: FROMGIT:
, FROMLIST:
,
- If the patch has been merged into an upstream maintainer tree, but has not yet
been merged into Linux mainline
- tag the patch subject with
FROMGIT:
- add info on where the patch came from as
(cherry picked from commit <sha1> <repo> <branch>)
. This must be a stable maintainer branch (not rebased, so don't uselinux-next
for example). - if changes were required, use
BACKPORT: FROMGIT:
- Example:
- if the commit message in the maintainer tree is
- tag the patch subject with
important patch from upstream
This is the detailed description of the important patch
Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>
- then Joe Smith would upload the patch for the common kernel as
FROMGIT: important patch from upstream
This is the detailed description of the important patch
Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>
Bug: 135791357
(cherry picked from commit 878a2fd9de10b03d11d2f622250285c7e63deace
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/foo/bar.git test-branch)
Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>
- If the patch has been submitted to LKML, but not accepted into any maintainer tree
- tag the patch subject with
FROMLIST:
- add a
Link:
tag with a link to the submittal on lore.kernel.org - add a
Bug:
tag with the Android bug (required for patches not accepted into a maintainer tree) - if changes were required, use
BACKPORT: FROMLIST:
- Example:
- tag the patch subject with
FROMLIST: important patch from upstream
This is the detailed description of the important patch
Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>
Bug: 135791357
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190619171517.GA17557@someone.com/
Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>
Requirements for Android-specific patches: ANDROID:
- If the patch is fixing a bug to Android-specific code
- tag the patch subject with
ANDROID:
- add a
Fixes:
tag that cites the patch with the bug - Example:
- tag the patch subject with
ANDROID: fix android-specific bug in foobar.c
This is the detailed description of the important fix
Fixes: 1234abcd2468 ("foobar: add cool feature")
Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>
- If the patch is a new feature
- tag the patch subject with
ANDROID:
- add a
Bug:
tag with the Android bug (required for android-specific features)
- tag the patch subject with