FireAsf 🔥
0ed01a4c84
[ Upstream commit 6e5860b0ad4934baee8c7a202c02033b2631bb44 ]
struct aac_srb_unit contains struct aac_srb, which contains struct sgmap,
which ends in a (currently) "fake" (1-element) flexible array. Converting
this to a flexible array is needed so that runtime bounds checking won't
think the array is fixed size (i.e. under CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE=y and/or
CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS=y), as other parts of aacraid use struct sgmap as a
flexible array.
It is not legal to have a flexible array in the middle of a structure, so
it either needs to be split up or rearranged so that it is at the end of
the structure. Luckily, struct aac_srb_unit, which is exclusively
consumed/updated by aac_send_safw_bmic_cmd(), does not depend on member
ordering.
The values set in the on-stack struct aac_srb_unit instance "srbu" by the
only two callers, aac_issue_safw_bmic_identify() and
aac_get_safw_ciss_luns(), do not contain anything in srbu.srb.sgmap.sg, and
they both implicitly initialize srbu.srb.sgmap.count to 0 during
memset(). For example:
memset(&srbu, 0, sizeof(struct aac_srb_unit));
srbcmd = &srbu.srb;
srbcmd->flags = cpu_to_le32(SRB_DataIn);
srbcmd->cdb[0] = CISS_REPORT_PHYSICAL_LUNS;
srbcmd->cdb[1] = 2; /* extended reporting */
srbcmd->cdb[8] = (u8)(datasize >> 8);
srbcmd->cdb[9] = (u8)(datasize);
rcode = aac_send_safw_bmic_cmd(dev, &srbu, phys_luns, datasize);
During aac_send_safw_bmic_cmd(), a separate srb is mapped into DMA, and has
srbu.srb copied into it:
srb = fib_data(fibptr);
memcpy(srb, &srbu->srb, sizeof(struct aac_srb));
Only then is srb.sgmap.count written and srb->sg populated:
srb->count = cpu_to_le32(xfer_len);
sg64 = (struct sgmap64 *)&srb->sg;
sg64->count = cpu_to_le32(1);
sg64->sg[0].addr[1] = cpu_to_le32(upper_32_bits(addr));
sg64->sg[0].addr[0] = cpu_to_le32(lower_32_bits(addr));
sg64->sg[0].count = cpu_to_le32(xfer_len);
But this is happening in the DMA memory, not in srbu.srb. An attempt to
copy the changes back to srbu does happen:
/*
* Copy the updated data for other dumping or other usage if
* needed
*/
memcpy(&srbu->srb, srb, sizeof(struct aac_srb));
But this was never correct: the sg64 (3 u32s) overlap of srb.sg (2 u32s)
always meant that srbu.srb would have held truncated information and any
attempt to walk srbu.srb.sg.sg based on the value of srbu.srb.sg.count
would result in attempting to parse past the end of srbu.srb.sg.sg[0] into
srbu.srb_reply.
After getting a reply from hardware, the reply is copied into
srbu.srb_reply:
srb_reply = (struct aac_srb_reply *)fib_data(fibptr);
memcpy(&srbu->srb_reply, srb_reply, sizeof(struct aac_srb_reply));
This has always been fixed-size, so there's no issue here. It is worth
noting that the two callers _never check_ srbu contents -- neither
srbu.srb nor srbu.srb_reply is examined. (They depend on the mapped
xfer_buf instead.)
Therefore, the ordering of members in struct aac_srb_unit does not matter,
and the flexible array member can moved to the end.
(Additionally, the two memcpy()s that update srbu could be entirely
removed as they are never consumed, but I left that as-is.)
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240711215739.208776-1-kees@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .github/workflows | ||
| android | ||
| arch | ||
| block | ||
| certs | ||
| crypto | ||
| Documentation | ||
| drivers | ||
| firmware/tsp_goodix | ||
| fs | ||
| gki | ||
| include | ||
| init | ||
| io_uring | ||
| ipc | ||
| kernel | ||
| kernel_build | ||
| KernelSU@b766b98513 | ||
| kunitconfigs | ||
| lib | ||
| LICENSES | ||
| mm | ||
| net | ||
| samples | ||
| scripts | ||
| security | ||
| sound | ||
| test | ||
| tools | ||
| usr | ||
| virt | ||
| build.config.aarch64 | ||
| build.config.allmodconfig | ||
| build.config.allmodconfig.aarch64 | ||
| build.config.allmodconfig.arm | ||
| build.config.allmodconfig.x86_64 | ||
| build.config.amlogic | ||
| build.config.arm | ||
| build.config.common | ||
| build.config.db845c | ||
| build.config.erd8825_a25_s | ||
| build.config.erd8825_s | ||
| build.config.erd9925_evt0_s | ||
| build.config.erd9925_evt0_s5300_s | ||
| build.config.erd9925_s | ||
| build.config.gki | ||
| build.config.gki-debug.aarch64 | ||
| build.config.gki-debug.x86_64 | ||
| build.config.gki.aarch64 | ||
| build.config.gki.aarch64.fips140 | ||
| build.config.gki.aarch64.fips140_eval_testing | ||
| build.config.gki.x86_64 | ||
| build.config.gki_kasan | ||
| build.config.gki_kasan.aarch64 | ||
| build.config.gki_kasan.x86_64 | ||
| build.config.gki_kprobes | ||
| build.config.gki_kprobes.aarch64 | ||
| build.config.gki_kprobes.x86_64 | ||
| build.config.hikey960 | ||
| build.config.khwasan | ||
| build.config.mcd | ||
| build.config.rockchip | ||
| build.config.universal2100_s | ||
| build.config.universal8825_s | ||
| build.config.universal9925_evt0_s | ||
| build.config.universal9925_s | ||
| build.config.x86_64 | ||
| build.sh | ||
| COPYING | ||
| CREDITS | ||
| Kbuild | ||
| Kconfig | ||
| linux-stable.sh | ||
| MAINTAINERS | ||
| Makefile | ||
| OWNERS | ||
| README | ||
| README.md | ||
| vendor_boot_module_order_exynos2100.cfg | ||
| vendor_boot_module_order_s5e8825.cfg | ||
| vendor_boot_module_order_s5e9925.cfg | ||
| vendor_module_list_s5e8825.cfg | ||
| vendor_module_list_s5e9925.cfg | ||
| vendor_module_list_s5e9925_b0s.cfg | ||
| vendor_module_list_s5e9925_g0s.cfg | ||
| vendor_module_list_s5e9925_r0s.cfg | ||
How do I submit patches to Android Common Kernels
-
BEST: Make all of your changes to upstream Linux. If appropriate, backport to the stable releases. These patches will be merged automatically in the corresponding common kernels. If the patch is already in upstream Linux, post a backport of the patch that conforms to the patch requirements below.
- Do not send patches upstream that contain only symbol exports. To be considered for upstream Linux,
additions of
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL()require an in-tree modular driver that uses the symbol -- so include the new driver or changes to an existing driver in the same patchset as the export. - When sending patches upstream, the commit message must contain a clear case for why the patch is needed and beneficial to the community. Enabling out-of-tree drivers or functionality is not not a persuasive case.
- Do not send patches upstream that contain only symbol exports. To be considered for upstream Linux,
additions of
-
LESS GOOD: Develop your patches out-of-tree (from an upstream Linux point-of-view). Unless these are fixing an Android-specific bug, these are very unlikely to be accepted unless they have been coordinated with kernel-team@android.com. If you want to proceed, post a patch that conforms to the patch requirements below.
Common Kernel patch requirements
- All patches must conform to the Linux kernel coding standards and pass
script/checkpatch.pl - Patches shall not break gki_defconfig or allmodconfig builds for arm, arm64, x86, x86_64 architectures (see https://source.android.com/setup/build/building-kernels)
- If the patch is not merged from an upstream branch, the subject must be tagged with the type of patch:
UPSTREAM:,BACKPORT:,FROMGIT:,FROMLIST:, orANDROID:. - All patches must have a
Change-Id:tag (see https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/Documentation/user-changeid.html) - If an Android bug has been assigned, there must be a
Bug:tag. - All patches must have a
Signed-off-by:tag by the author and the submitter
Additional requirements are listed below based on patch type
Requirements for backports from mainline Linux: UPSTREAM:, BACKPORT:
- If the patch is a cherry-pick from Linux mainline with no changes at all
- tag the patch subject with
UPSTREAM:. - add upstream commit information with a
(cherry picked from commit ...)line - Example:
- if the upstream commit message is
- tag the patch subject with
important patch from upstream
This is the detailed description of the important patch
Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>
- then Joe Smith would upload the patch for the common kernel as
UPSTREAM: important patch from upstream
This is the detailed description of the important patch
Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>
Bug: 135791357
Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
(cherry picked from commit c31e73121f4c1ec41143423ac6ce3ce6dafdcec1)
Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>
- If the patch requires any changes from the upstream version, tag the patch with
BACKPORT:instead ofUPSTREAM:.- use the same tags as
UPSTREAM: - add comments about the changes under the
(cherry picked from commit ...)line - Example:
- use the same tags as
BACKPORT: important patch from upstream
This is the detailed description of the important patch
Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>
Bug: 135791357
Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
(cherry picked from commit c31e73121f4c1ec41143423ac6ce3ce6dafdcec1)
[joe: Resolved minor conflict in drivers/foo/bar.c ]
Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>
Requirements for other backports: FROMGIT:, FROMLIST:,
- If the patch has been merged into an upstream maintainer tree, but has not yet
been merged into Linux mainline
- tag the patch subject with
FROMGIT: - add info on where the patch came from as
(cherry picked from commit <sha1> <repo> <branch>). This must be a stable maintainer branch (not rebased, so don't uselinux-nextfor example). - if changes were required, use
BACKPORT: FROMGIT: - Example:
- if the commit message in the maintainer tree is
- tag the patch subject with
important patch from upstream
This is the detailed description of the important patch
Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>
- then Joe Smith would upload the patch for the common kernel as
FROMGIT: important patch from upstream
This is the detailed description of the important patch
Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>
Bug: 135791357
(cherry picked from commit 878a2fd9de10b03d11d2f622250285c7e63deace
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/foo/bar.git test-branch)
Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>
- If the patch has been submitted to LKML, but not accepted into any maintainer tree
- tag the patch subject with
FROMLIST: - add a
Link:tag with a link to the submittal on lore.kernel.org - add a
Bug:tag with the Android bug (required for patches not accepted into a maintainer tree) - if changes were required, use
BACKPORT: FROMLIST: - Example:
- tag the patch subject with
FROMLIST: important patch from upstream
This is the detailed description of the important patch
Signed-off-by: Fred Jones <fred.jones@foo.org>
Bug: 135791357
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190619171517.GA17557@someone.com/
Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>
Requirements for Android-specific patches: ANDROID:
- If the patch is fixing a bug to Android-specific code
- tag the patch subject with
ANDROID: - add a
Fixes:tag that cites the patch with the bug - Example:
- tag the patch subject with
ANDROID: fix android-specific bug in foobar.c
This is the detailed description of the important fix
Fixes: 1234abcd2468 ("foobar: add cool feature")
Change-Id: I4caaaa566ea080fa148c5e768bb1a0b6f7201c01
Signed-off-by: Joe Smith <joe.smith@foo.org>
- If the patch is a new feature
- tag the patch subject with
ANDROID: - add a
Bug:tag with the Android bug (required for android-specific features)
- tag the patch subject with