[ Upstream commit b8e947e9f64cac9df85a07672b658df5b2bcff07 ]
Some arch + compiler combinations report a potentially unused variable
location in btrfs_lookup_dentry(). This is a false alert as the variable
is passed by value and always valid or there's an error. The compilers
cannot probably reason about that although btrfs_inode_by_name() is in
the same file.
> + /kisskb/src/fs/btrfs/inode.c: error: 'location.objectid' may be used
+uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]: => 5603:9
> + /kisskb/src/fs/btrfs/inode.c: error: 'location.type' may be used
+uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]: => 5674:5
m68k-gcc8/m68k-allmodconfig
mips-gcc8/mips-allmodconfig
powerpc-gcc5/powerpc-all{mod,yes}config
powerpc-gcc5/ppc64_defconfig
Initialize it to zero, this should fix the warnings and won't change the
behaviour as btrfs_inode_by_name() accepts only a root or inode item
types, otherwise returns an error.
Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/bd4e9928-17b3-9257-8ba7-6b7f9bbb639a@linux-m68k.org/
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 6fbc6f4ac1f4907da4fc674251527e7dc79ffbf6 ]
The may_destroy_subvol() looks up a root by a key, allowing to do an
inexact search when key->offset is -1. It's never expected to find such
item, as it would break the allowed range of a root id.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 3c6f0c5ecc8910d4ffb0dfe85609ebc0c91c8f34 ]
Currently, this call site in btrfs_clear_delalloc_extent() only converts
the reservation. We are marking it not delalloc, so I don't think it
makes sense to keep the rsv around. This is a path where we are not
sure to join a transaction, so it leads to incorrect free-ing during
umount.
Helps with the pass rate of generic/269 and generic/475.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 3324d0547861b16cf436d54abba7052e0c8aa9de ]
Sweet Tea spotted a race between subvolume deletion and snapshotting
that can result in the root item for the snapshot having the
BTRFS_ROOT_SUBVOL_DEAD flag set. The race is:
Thread 1 | Thread 2
----------------------------------------------|----------
btrfs_delete_subvolume |
btrfs_set_root_flags(BTRFS_ROOT_SUBVOL_DEAD)|
|btrfs_mksubvol
| down_read(subvol_sem)
| create_snapshot
| ...
| create_pending_snapshot
| copy root item from source
down_write(subvol_sem) |
This flag is only checked in send and swap activate, which this would
cause to fail mysteriously.
create_snapshot() now checks the root refs to reject a deleted
subvolume, so we can fix this by locking subvol_sem earlier so that the
BTRFS_ROOT_SUBVOL_DEAD flag and the root refs are updated atomically.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Reported-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
Reviewed-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit ee0d904fd9c5662c58a737c77384f8959fdc8d12 ]
Use only a single 'ret' to control whether we should abort the
transaction or not. That's fine, because if we abort a transaction then
btrfs_end_transaction will return the same value as passed to
btrfs_abort_transaction. No semantic changes.
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Stable-dep-of: 3324d0547861 ("btrfs: avoid copying BTRFS_ROOT_SUBVOL_DEAD flag to snapshot of subvolume being deleted")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
