[ Upstream commit f36c2943274199cb8aef32ac96531ffb7c4b43d0 ]
This change renames fcheck_files to files_lookup_fd_rcu. All of the
remaining callers take the rcu_read_lock before calling this function
so the _rcu suffix is appropriate. This change also tightens up the
debug check to verify that all callers hold the rcu_read_lock.
All callers that used to call files_check with the files->file_lock
held have now been changed to call files_lookup_fd_locked.
This change of name has helped remind me of which locks and which
guarantees are in place helping me to catch bugs later in the
patchset.
The need for better names became apparent in the last round of
discussion of this set of changes[1].
[1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAHk-=wj8BQbgJFLa+J0e=iT-1qpmCRTbPAJ8gd6MJQ=kbRPqyQ@mail.gmail.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201120231441.29911-9-ebiederm@xmission.com
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 120ce2b0cd52abe73e8b16c23461eb14df5a87d8 ]
To make it easy to tell where files->file_lock protection is being
used when looking up a file create files_lookup_fd_locked. Only allow
this function to be called with the file_lock held.
Update the callers of fcheck and fcheck_files that are called with the
files->file_lock held to call files_lookup_fd_locked instead.
Hopefully this makes it easier to quickly understand what is going on.
The need for better names became apparent in the last round of
discussion of this set of changes[1].
[1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAHk-=wj8BQbgJFLa+J0e=iT-1qpmCRTbPAJ8gd6MJQ=kbRPqyQ@mail.gmail.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201120231441.29911-8-ebiederm@xmission.com
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit bebf684bf330915e6c96313ad7db89a5480fc9c2 ]
The function fcheck despite it's comment is poorly named
as it has no callers that only check it's return value.
All of fcheck's callers use the returned file descriptor.
The same is true for fcheck_files and __fcheck_files.
A new less confusing name is needed. In addition the names
of these functions are confusing as they do not report
the kind of locks that are needed to be held when these
functions are called making error prone to use them.
To remedy this I am making the base functio name lookup_fd
and will and prefixes and sufficies to indicate the rest
of the context.
Name the function (previously called __fcheck_files) that proceeds
from a struct files_struct, looks up the struct file of a file
descriptor, and requires it's callers to verify all of the appropriate
locks are held files_lookup_fd_raw.
The need for better names became apparent in the last round of
discussion of this set of changes[1].
[1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAHk-=wj8BQbgJFLa+J0e=iT-1qpmCRTbPAJ8gd6MJQ=kbRPqyQ@mail.gmail.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201120231441.29911-7-ebiederm@xmission.com
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
[ cel: adjusted to apply to v5.10.y ]
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 950db38ff2c01b7aabbd7ab4a50b7992750fa63d ]
Now that exec no longer needs to restore the previous value of current->files
on error there are no more callers of reset_files_struct so remove it.
Acked-by: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
v1: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200817220425.9389-3-ebiederm@xmission.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201120231441.29911-3-ebiederm@xmission.com
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
