commit 7835fcfd132eb88b87e8eb901f88436f63ab60f7 upstream.
struct hci_dev members conn_info_max_age, conn_info_min_age,
le_conn_max_interval, le_conn_min_interval, le_adv_max_interval,
and le_adv_min_interval can be modified from the HCI core code, as well
through debugfs.
The debugfs implementation, that's only available to privileged users,
will check for boundaries, making sure that the minimum value being set
is strictly above the maximum value that already exists, and vice-versa.
However, as both minimum and maximum values can be changed concurrently
to us modifying them, we need to make sure that the value we check is
the value we end up using.
For example, with ->conn_info_max_age set to 10, conn_info_min_age_set()
gets called from vfs handlers to set conn_info_min_age to 8.
In conn_info_min_age_set(), this goes through:
if (val == 0 || val > hdev->conn_info_max_age)
return -EINVAL;
Concurrently, conn_info_max_age_set() gets called to set to set the
conn_info_max_age to 7:
if (val == 0 || val > hdev->conn_info_max_age)
return -EINVAL;
That check will also pass because we used the old value (10) for
conn_info_max_age.
After those checks that both passed, the struct hci_dev access
is mutex-locked, disabling concurrent access, but that does not matter
because the invalid value checks both passed, and we'll end up with
conn_info_min_age = 8 and conn_info_max_age = 7
To fix this problem, we need to lock the structure access before so the
check and assignment are not interrupted.
This fix was originally devised by the BassCheck[1] team, and
considered the problem to be an atomicity one. This isn't the case as
there aren't any concerns about the variable changing while we check it,
but rather after we check it parallel to another change.
This patch fixes CVE-2024-24858 and CVE-2024-24857.
[1] https://sites.google.com/view/basscheck/
Co-developed-by: Gui-Dong Han <2045gemini@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Gui-Dong Han <2045gemini@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-bluetooth/20231222161317.6255-1-2045gemini@gmail.com/
Link: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-24858
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-bluetooth/20231222162931.6553-1-2045gemini@gmail.com/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-bluetooth/20231222162310.6461-1-2045gemini@gmail.com/
Link: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-24857
Fixes: 31ad169148df ("Bluetooth: Add conn info lifetime parameters to debugfs")
Fixes: 729a1051da6f ("Bluetooth: Expose default LE advertising interval via debugfs")
Fixes: 71c3b60ec6d2 ("Bluetooth: Move BR/EDR debugfs file creation into hci_debugfs.c")
Signed-off-by: Bastien Nocera <hadess@hadess.net>
Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit da9065caa594d19b26e1a030fd0cc27bd365d685 upstream.
In min_key_size_set():
if (val > hdev->le_max_key_size || val < SMP_MIN_ENC_KEY_SIZE)
return -EINVAL;
hci_dev_lock(hdev);
hdev->le_min_key_size = val;
hci_dev_unlock(hdev);
In max_key_size_set():
if (val > SMP_MAX_ENC_KEY_SIZE || val < hdev->le_min_key_size)
return -EINVAL;
hci_dev_lock(hdev);
hdev->le_max_key_size = val;
hci_dev_unlock(hdev);
The atomicity violation occurs due to concurrent execution of set_min and
set_max funcs.Consider a scenario where setmin writes a new, valid 'min'
value, and concurrently, setmax writes a value that is greater than the
old 'min' but smaller than the new 'min'. In this case, setmax might check
against the old 'min' value (before acquiring the lock) but write its
value after the 'min' has been updated by setmin. This leads to a
situation where the 'max' value ends up being smaller than the 'min'
value, which is an inconsistency.
This possible bug is found by an experimental static analysis tool
developed by our team, BassCheck[1]. This tool analyzes the locking APIs
to extract function pairs that can be concurrently executed, and then
analyzes the instructions in the paired functions to identify possible
concurrency bugs including data races and atomicity violations. The above
possible bug is reported when our tool analyzes the source code of
Linux 5.17.
To resolve this issue, it is suggested to encompass the validity checks
within the locked sections in both set_min and set_max funcs. The
modification ensures that the validation of 'val' against the
current min/max values is atomic, thus maintaining the integrity of the
settings. With this patch applied, our tool no longer reports the bug,
with the kernel configuration allyesconfig for x86_64. Due to the lack of
associated hardware, we cannot test the patch in runtime testing, and just
verify it according to the code logic.
[1] https://sites.google.com/view/basscheck/
Fixes: 18f81241b74f ("Bluetooth: Move {min,max}_key_size debugfs ...")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Gui-Dong Han <2045gemini@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
