[ Upstream commit beaa51b36012fad5a4d3c18b88a617aea7a9b96d ]
UBSAN catches undefined behavior in blk-iocost, where sometimes
iocg->delay is shifted right by a number that is too large,
resulting in undefined behavior on some architectures.
[ 186.556576] ------------[ cut here ]------------
UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in block/blk-iocost.c:1366:23
shift exponent 64 is too large for 64-bit type 'u64' (aka 'unsigned long long')
CPU: 16 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/16 Tainted: G S E N 6.9.0-0_fbk700_debug_rc2_kbuilder_0_gc85af715cac0 #1
Hardware name: Quanta Twin Lakes MP/Twin Lakes Passive MP, BIOS F09_3A23 12/08/2020
Call Trace:
<IRQ>
dump_stack_lvl+0x8f/0xe0
__ubsan_handle_shift_out_of_bounds+0x22c/0x280
iocg_kick_delay+0x30b/0x310
ioc_timer_fn+0x2fb/0x1f80
__run_timer_base+0x1b6/0x250
...
Avoid that undefined behavior by simply taking the
"delay = 0" branch if the shift is too large.
I am not sure what the symptoms of an undefined value
delay will be, but I suspect it could be more than a
little annoying to debug.
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240404123253.0f58010f@imladris.surriel.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 2a427b49d02995ea4a6ff93a1432c40fa4d36821 ]
When iocg_kick_delay() is called from a CPU different than the one which set
the delay, @now may be in the past of @iocg->delay_at leading to the
following warning:
UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in block/blk-iocost.c:1359:23
shift exponent 18446744073709 is too large for 64-bit type 'u64' (aka 'unsigned long long')
...
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0x79/0xc0
__ubsan_handle_shift_out_of_bounds+0x2ab/0x300
iocg_kick_delay+0x222/0x230
ioc_rqos_merge+0x1d7/0x2c0
__rq_qos_merge+0x2c/0x80
bio_attempt_back_merge+0x83/0x190
blk_attempt_plug_merge+0x101/0x150
blk_mq_submit_bio+0x2b1/0x720
submit_bio_noacct_nocheck+0x320/0x3e0
__swap_writepage+0x2ab/0x9d0
The underflow itself doesn't really affect the behavior in any meaningful
way; however, the past timestamp may exaggerate the delay amount calculated
later in the code, which shouldn't be a material problem given the nature of
the delay mechanism.
If @now is in the past, this CPU is racing another CPU which recently set up
the delay and there's nothing this CPU can contribute w.r.t. the delay.
Let's bail early from iocg_kick_delay() in such cases.
Reported-by: Breno Leitão <leitao@debian.org>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Fixes: 5160a5a53c0c ("blk-iocost: implement delay adjustment hysteresis")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/ZVvc9L_CYk5LO1fT@slm.duckdns.org
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
