commit d176708ffc20332d1c730098d2b111e0b77ece82 upstream.
Use the new soc_intel_is_byt() helper from linux/platform_data/x86/soc.h.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220131143539.109142-5-hdegoede@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
[Ricardo: Resolved minor cherry-pick conflict. The file linux/regulator/
consumer.h is not #included in the upstream version but it is in
v5.10.y. ]
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit ccbfea78adf75d3d9e87aa739dab83254f5333fa ]
In case the touch controller is not connected, this message keeps scrolling
on the console indefinitelly. Ratelimit it to avoid filling kernel logs.
"
ads7846 spi2.1: spi_sync --> -22
"
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240708211913.171243-1-marex@denx.de
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 38a38f5a36da9820680d413972cb733349400532 ]
When support for Silead touchscreens was orginal added some touchscreens
with older firmware versions only supported 5 fingers and this was made
the default requiring the setting of a "silead,max-fingers=10" uint32
device-property for all touchscreen models which do support 10 fingers.
There are very few models with the old 5 finger fw, so in practice the
setting of the "silead,max-fingers=10" is boilerplate which needs to
be copy and pasted to every touchscreen config.
Reporting that 10 fingers are supported on devices which only support
5 fingers doesn't cause any problems for userspace in practice, since
at max 4 finger gestures are supported anyways. Drop the max_fingers
configuration and simply always assume 10 fingers.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240525193854.39130-2-hdegoede@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 9f0fad0382124e7e23b3c730fa78818c22c89c0a ]
The caller of this function treats all non-zero values as an error, so
the return value of i2c_master_recv() cannot be returned directly.
This fixes touch reporting when there are more than 6 active touches.
Fixes: ef536abd3afd1 ("Input: ili210x - define and use chip operations structure")
Signed-off-by: John Keeping <jkeeping@inmusicbrands.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240523085624.2295988-1-jkeeping@inmusicbrands.com
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 423622a90abb243944d1517b9f57db53729e45c4 upstream.
Add a special case for gpio_count == 1 && gpio_int_idx == 0 to
goodix_add_acpi_gpio_mappings().
It seems that on newer x86/ACPI devices the reset and irq GPIOs are no
longer listed as GPIO resources instead there is only 1 GpioInt resource
and _PS0 does the whole reset sequence for us.
This means that we must call acpi_device_fix_up_power() on these devices
to ensure that the chip is reset before we try to use it.
This part was already fixed in commit 3de93e6ed2df ("Input: goodix - call
acpi_device_fix_up_power() in some cases") by adding a call to
acpi_device_fix_up_power() to the generic "Unexpected ACPI resources"
catch all.
But it turns out that this case on some hw needs some more special
handling. Specifically the firmware may bootup with the IRQ pin in
output mode. The reset sequence from ACPI _PS0 (executed by
acpi_device_fix_up_power()) should put the pin in input mode,
but the GPIO subsystem has cached the direction at bootup, causing
request_irq() to fail due to gpiochip_lock_as_irq() failure:
[ 9.119864] Goodix-TS i2c-GDIX1002:00: Unexpected ACPI resources: gpio_count 1, gpio_int_idx 0
[ 9.317443] Goodix-TS i2c-GDIX1002:00: ID 911, version: 1060
[ 9.321902] input: Goodix Capacitive TouchScreen as /devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:17.0/i2c_designware.4/i2c-5/i2c-GDIX1002:00/input/input8
[ 9.327840] gpio gpiochip0: (INT3453:00): gpiochip_lock_as_irq: tried to flag a GPIO set as output for IRQ
[ 9.327856] gpio gpiochip0: (INT3453:00): unable to lock HW IRQ 26 for IRQ
[ 9.327861] genirq: Failed to request resources for GDIX1002:00 (irq 131) on irqchip intel-gpio
[ 9.327912] Goodix-TS i2c-GDIX1002:00: request IRQ failed: -5
Fix this by adding a special case for gpio_count == 1 && gpio_int_idx == 0
which adds an ACPI GPIO lookup table for the int GPIO even though we cannot
use it for reset purposes (as there is no reset GPIO).
Adding the lookup will make the gpiod_int = gpiod_get(..., GPIOD_IN) call
succeed, which will explicitly set the direction to input fixing the issue.
Note this re-uses the acpi_goodix_int_first_gpios[] lookup table, since
there is only 1 GPIO in the ACPI resources the reset entry in that
lookup table will amount to a no-op.
Reported-and-tested-by: Michael Smith <1973.mjsmith@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231003215144.69527-1-hdegoede@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
