[ Upstream commit e8061f06185be0a06a73760d6526b8b0feadfe52 ]
Previously, access_guest_page() did not check whether the given guest
address is inside of a memslot. This is not a problem, since
kvm_write_guest_page/kvm_read_guest_page return -EFAULT in this case.
However, -EFAULT is also returned when copy_to/from_user fails.
When emulating a guest instruction, the address being outside a memslot
usually means that an addressing exception should be injected into the
guest.
Failure in copy_to/from_user however indicates that something is wrong
in userspace and hence should be handled there.
To be able to distinguish these two cases, return PGM_ADDRESSING in
access_guest_page() when the guest address is outside guest memory. In
access_guest_real(), populate vcpu->arch.pgm.code such that
kvm_s390_inject_prog_cond() can be used in the caller for injecting into
the guest (if applicable).
Since this adds a new return value to access_guest_page(), we need to make
sure that other callers are not confused by the new positive return value.
There are the following users of access_guest_page():
- access_guest_with_key() does the checking itself (in
guest_range_to_gpas()), so this case should never happen. Even if, the
handling is set up properly.
- access_guest_real() just passes the return code to its callers, which
are:
- read_guest_real() - see below
- write_guest_real() - see below
There are the following users of read_guest_real():
- ar_translation() in gaccess.c which already returns PGM_*
- setup_apcb10(), setup_apcb00(), setup_apcb11() in vsie.c which always
return -EFAULT on read_guest_read() nonzero return - no change
- shadow_crycb(), handle_stfle() always present this as validity, this
could be handled better but doesn't change current behaviour - no change
There are the following users of write_guest_real():
- kvm_s390_store_status_unloaded() always returns -EFAULT on
write_guest_real() failure.
Fixes: 2293897805c2 ("KVM: s390: add architecture compliant guest access functions")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240917151904.74314-2-nrb@linux.ibm.com
Acked-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 7faa543df19bf62d4583a64d3902705747f2ad29 ]
Do not round down the first address to the page boundary, just translate
it normally, which gives the value we care about in the first place.
Given this, translating a single address is just the special case of
translating a range spanning a single page.
Make the output optional, so the function can be used to just check a
range.
Signed-off-by: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20211126164549.7046-3-scgl@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Stable-dep-of: e8061f06185b ("KVM: s390: gaccess: Check if guest address is in memslot")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit cad4b3d4ab1f062708fff33f44d246853f51e966 upstream.
The parameters for the diag 0x258 are real addresses, not virtual, but
KVM was using them as virtual addresses. This only happened to work, since
the Linux kernel as a guest used to have a 1:1 mapping for physical vs
virtual addresses.
Fix KVM so that it correctly uses the addresses as real addresses.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 8ae04b8f500b ("KVM: s390: Guest's memory access functions get access registers")
Suggested-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240917151904.74314-3-nrb@linux.ibm.com
Acked-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit b988b1bb0053c0dcd26187d29ef07566a565cf55 ]
kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_fpu() allows to set the floating point control
(fpc) register of a guest cpu. The new value is tested for validity by
temporarily loading it into the fpc register.
This may lead to corruption of the fpc register of the host process:
if an interrupt happens while the value is temporarily loaded into the fpc
register, and within interrupt context floating point or vector registers
are used, the current fp/vx registers are saved with save_fpu_regs()
assuming they belong to user space and will be loaded into fp/vx registers
when returning to user space.
test_fp_ctl() restores the original user space / host process fpc register
value, however it will be discarded, when returning to user space.
In result the host process will incorrectly continue to run with the value
that was supposed to be used for a guest cpu.
Fix this by simply removing the test. There is another test right before
the SIE context is entered which will handles invalid values.
This results in a change of behaviour: invalid values will now be accepted
instead of that the ioctl fails with -EINVAL. This seems to be acceptable,
given that this interface is most likely not used anymore, and this is in
addition the same behaviour implemented with the memory mapped interface
(replace invalid values with zero) - see sync_regs() in kvm-s390.c.
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
