commit 1442ee0011983f0c5c4b92380e6853afb513841a upstream.
Kunkun Jiang reported that there is a small window of opportunity for
userspace to force a change of affinity for a VPE while the VPE has already
been unmapped, but the corresponding doorbell interrupt still visible in
/proc/irq/.
Plug the race by checking the value of vmapp_count, which tracks whether
the VPE is mapped ot not, and returning an error in this case.
This involves making vmapp_count common to both GICv4.1 and its v4.0
ancestor.
Fixes: 64edfaa9a234 ("irqchip/gic-v4.1: Implement the v4.1 flavour of VMAPP")
Reported-by: Kunkun Jiang <jiangkunkun@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/c182ece6-2ba0-ce4f-3404-dba7a3ab6c52@huawei.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241002204959.2051709-1-maz@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 80e9963fb3b5509dfcabe9652d56bf4b35542055 upstream.
As per the GICv4.1 spec (Arm IHI 0069H, 5.3.19):
"A VMAPP with {V, Alloc}=={0, x} is self-synchronizing, This means the ITS
command queue does not show the command as consumed until all of its
effects are completed."
Furthermore, VSYNC is allowed to deliver an SError when referencing a
non existent VPE.
By these definitions, a VMAPP followed by a VSYNC is a bug, as the
later references a VPE that has been unmapped by the former.
Fix it by eliding the VSYNC in this scenario.
Fixes: 64edfaa9a234 ("irqchip/gic-v4.1: Implement the v4.1 flavour of VMAPP")
Signed-off-by: Nianyao Tang <tangnianyao@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240406022737.3898763-1-tangnianyao@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit 382d2ffe86efb1e2fa803d2cf17e5bfc34e574f3 ]
This BUG_ON() is useless, because the same effect will be obtained
by letting the code run its course and vm being dereferenced,
triggering an exception.
So just remove this check.
Signed-off-by: Guanrui Huang <guanrui.huang@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240418061053.96803-3-guanrui.huang@linux.alibaba.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit c26591afd33adce296c022e3480dea4282b7ef91 upstream.
The error handling path in its_vpe_irq_domain_alloc() causes a double free
when its_vpe_init() fails after successfully allocating at least one
interrupt. This happens because its_vpe_irq_domain_free() frees the
interrupts along with the area bitmap and the vprop_page and
its_vpe_irq_domain_alloc() subsequently frees the area bitmap and the
vprop_page again.
Fix this by unconditionally invoking its_vpe_irq_domain_free() which
handles all cases correctly and by removing the bitmap/vprop_page freeing
from its_vpe_irq_domain_alloc().
[ tglx: Massaged change log ]
Fixes: 7d75bbb4bc1a ("irqchip/gic-v3-its: Add VPE irq domain allocation/teardown")
Signed-off-by: Guanrui Huang <guanrui.huang@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240418061053.96803-2-guanrui.huang@linux.alibaba.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit af9acbfc2c4b72c378d0b9a2ee023ed01055d3e2 upstream.
When updating the affinity of a VPE, the VMOVP command is currently skipped
if the two CPUs are part of the same VPE affinity.
But this is wrong, as the doorbell corresponding to this VPE is still
delivered on the 'old' CPU, which screws up the balancing. Furthermore,
offlining that 'old' CPU results in doorbell interrupts generated for this
VPE being discarded.
The harsh reality is that VMOVP cannot be elided when a set_affinity()
request occurs. It needs to be obeyed, and if an optimisation is to be
made, it is at the point where the affinity change request is made (such as
in KVM).
Drop the VMOVP elision altogether, and only use the vpe_table_mask
to try and stay within the same ITS affinity group if at all possible.
Fixes: dd3f050a216e (irqchip/gic-v4.1: Implement the v4.1 flavour of VMOVP)
Reported-by: Kunkun Jiang <jiangkunkun@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240213101206.2137483-4-maz@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
