Alexander Sverdlin
e33d8bd4a9
net: dsa: lan9303: consequently nested-lock physical MDIO
...
commit 5a22fbcc10f3f7d94c5d88afbbffa240a3677057 upstream.
When LAN9303 is MDIO-connected two callchains exist into
mdio->bus->write():
1. switch ports 1&2 ("physical" PHYs):
virtual (switch-internal) MDIO bus (lan9303_switch_ops->phy_{read|write})->
lan9303_mdio_phy_{read|write} -> mdiobus_{read|write}_nested
2. LAN9303 virtual PHY:
virtual MDIO bus (lan9303_phy_{read|write}) ->
lan9303_virt_phy_reg_{read|write} -> regmap -> lan9303_mdio_{read|write}
If the latter functions just take
mutex_lock(&sw_dev->device->bus->mdio_lock) it triggers a LOCKDEP
false-positive splat. It's false-positive because the first
mdio_lock in the second callchain above belongs to virtual MDIO bus, the
second mdio_lock belongs to physical MDIO bus.
Consequent annotation in lan9303_mdio_{read|write} as nested lock
(similar to lan9303_mdio_phy_{read|write}, it's the same physical MDIO bus)
prevents the following splat:
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.15.71 #1 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
kworker/u4:3/609 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff000011531c68 (lan9303_mdio:131:(&lan9303_mdio_regmap_config)->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: regmap_lock_mutex
but task is already holding lock:
ffff0000114c44d8 (&bus->mdio_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: mdiobus_read
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #1 (&bus->mdio_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
lock_acquire
__mutex_lock
mutex_lock_nested
lan9303_mdio_read
_regmap_read
regmap_read
lan9303_probe
lan9303_mdio_probe
mdio_probe
really_probe
__driver_probe_device
driver_probe_device
__device_attach_driver
bus_for_each_drv
__device_attach
device_initial_probe
bus_probe_device
deferred_probe_work_func
process_one_work
worker_thread
kthread
ret_from_fork
-> #0 (lan9303_mdio:131:(&lan9303_mdio_regmap_config)->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__lock_acquire
lock_acquire.part.0
lock_acquire
__mutex_lock
mutex_lock_nested
regmap_lock_mutex
regmap_read
lan9303_phy_read
dsa_slave_phy_read
__mdiobus_read
mdiobus_read
get_phy_device
mdiobus_scan
__mdiobus_register
dsa_register_switch
lan9303_probe
lan9303_mdio_probe
mdio_probe
really_probe
__driver_probe_device
driver_probe_device
__device_attach_driver
bus_for_each_drv
__device_attach
device_initial_probe
bus_probe_device
deferred_probe_work_func
process_one_work
worker_thread
kthread
ret_from_fork
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&bus->mdio_lock);
lock(lan9303_mdio:131:(&lan9303_mdio_regmap_config)->lock);
lock(&bus->mdio_lock);
lock(lan9303_mdio:131:(&lan9303_mdio_regmap_config)->lock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
5 locks held by kworker/u4:3/609:
#0 : ffff000002842938 ((wq_completion)events_unbound){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work
#1 : ffff80000bacbd60 (deferred_probe_work){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work
#2 : ffff000007645178 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: __device_attach
#3 : ffff8000096e6e78 (dsa2_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: dsa_register_switch
#4 : ffff0000114c44d8 (&bus->mdio_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: mdiobus_read
stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 609 Comm: kworker/u4:3 Not tainted 5.15.71 #1
Workqueue: events_unbound deferred_probe_work_func
Call trace:
dump_backtrace
show_stack
dump_stack_lvl
dump_stack
print_circular_bug
check_noncircular
__lock_acquire
lock_acquire.part.0
lock_acquire
__mutex_lock
mutex_lock_nested
regmap_lock_mutex
regmap_read
lan9303_phy_read
dsa_slave_phy_read
__mdiobus_read
mdiobus_read
get_phy_device
mdiobus_scan
__mdiobus_register
dsa_register_switch
lan9303_probe
lan9303_mdio_probe
...
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: dc7005831523 ("net: dsa: LAN9303: add MDIO managed mode support")
Signed-off-by: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@siemens.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231027065741.534971-1-alexander.sverdlin@siemens.com
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-11-18 11:43:30 +01:00
Jinjie Ruan
ccb950513d
net: dsa: bcm_sf2: Fix possible memory leak in bcm_sf2_mdio_register()
...
commit 61b40cefe51af005c72dbdcf975a3d166c6e6406 upstream.
In bcm_sf2_mdio_register(), the class_find_device() will call get_device()
to increment reference count for priv->master_mii_bus->dev if
of_mdio_find_bus() succeeds. If mdiobus_alloc() or mdiobus_register()
fails, it will call get_device() twice without decrement reference count
for the device. And it is the same if bcm_sf2_mdio_register() succeeds but
fails in bcm_sf2_sw_probe(), or if bcm_sf2_sw_probe() succeeds. If the
reference count has not decremented to zero, the dev related resource will
not be freed.
So remove the get_device() in bcm_sf2_mdio_register(), and call
put_device() if mdiobus_alloc() or mdiobus_register() fails and in
bcm_sf2_mdio_unregister() to solve the issue.
And as Simon suggested, unwind from errors for bcm_sf2_mdio_register() and
just return 0 if it succeeds to make it cleaner.
Fixes: 461cd1b03e32 ("net: dsa: bcm_sf2: Register our slave MDIO bus")
Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Suggested-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231011032419.2423290-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-11-08 11:26:11 +01:00
