[ Upstream commit a6c3ea1ec96307dbfbb2f16d96c674c5cc80f445 ]
Remove the unused cif_stack argument and add a protype in oplib_64.h
Commit ef3e035c3a9b ("sparc64: Fix register corruption in top-most
kernel stack frame during boot.") removed the cif_stack argument to
prom_cif init in the declaration at the caller site and the usage of it
within prom_cif_init, but not in the function signature of the function
itself.
This also fixes the following warning:
arch/sparc/prom/p1275.c:52:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘prom_cif_init’
Fixes: ef3e035c3a9b ("sparc64: Fix register corruption in top-most kernel stack frame during boot.")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240710094155.458731-3-andreas@gaisler.com
Signed-off-by: Andreas Larsson <andreas@gaisler.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit c32d18e7942d7589b62e301eb426b32623366565 upstream.
Every other arch declares struct termio in asm/termios.h, so make sparc
match them.
Resolves a build failure in the PPP software package, which includes
both bits/ioctl-types.h via sys/ioctl.h (glibc) and asm/termbits.h.
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/918992
Signed-off-by: Mike Gilbert <floppym@gentoo.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Andreas Larsson <andreas@gaisler.com>
Tested-by: Andreas Larsson <andreas@gaisler.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240306171149.3843481-1-floppym@gentoo.org
Signed-off-by: Andreas Larsson <andreas@gaisler.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 98937707fea8375e8acea0aaa0b68a956dd52719 upstream.
Nick Bowler reported:
When using newer kernels on my Ultra 60 with dual 450MHz UltraSPARC-II
CPUs, I noticed that only CPU 0 comes up, while older kernels (including
4.7) are working fine with both CPUs.
I bisected the failure to this commit:
9b2f753ec23710aa32c0d837d2499db92fe9115b is the first bad commit
commit 9b2f753ec23710aa32c0d837d2499db92fe9115b
Author: Atish Patra <atish.patra@oracle.com>
Date: Thu Sep 15 14:54:40 2016 -0600
sparc64: Fix cpu_possible_mask if nr_cpus is set
This is a small change that reverts very easily on top of 5.18: there is
just one trivial conflict. Once reverted, both CPUs work again.
Maybe this is related to the fact that the CPUs on this system are
numbered CPU0 and CPU2 (there is no CPU1)?
The current code that adjust cpu_possible based on nr_cpu_ids do not
take into account that CPU's may not come one after each other.
Move the chech to the function that setup the cpu_possible mask
so there is no need to adjust it later.
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Fixes: 9b2f753ec237 ("sparc64: Fix cpu_possible_mask if nr_cpus is set")
Reported-by: Nick Bowler <nbowler@draconx.ca>
Tested-by: Nick Bowler <nbowler@draconx.ca>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/sparclinux/20201009161924.c8f031c079dd852941307870@gmx.de/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CADyTPEwt=ZNams+1bpMB1F9w_vUdPsGCt92DBQxxq_VtaLoTdw@mail.gmail.com/
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.8+
Cc: Andreas Larsson <andreas@gaisler.com>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Atish Patra <atish.patra@oracle.com>
Cc: Bob Picco <bob.picco@oracle.com>
Cc: Vijay Kumar <vijay.ac.kumar@oracle.com>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Larsson <andreas@gaisler.com>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240330-sparc64-warnings-v1-9-37201023ee2f@ravnborg.org
Signed-off-by: Andreas Larsson <andreas@gaisler.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
