commit 5c178472af247c7b50f962495bb7462ba453b9fb upstream.
This is used in poison.h for poison pointer offset. Based on current
SV39, SV48 and SV57 vm layout, 0xdead000000000000 is a proper value
that is not mappable, this can avoid potentially turning an oops to
an expolit.
Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>
Fixes: fbe934d69eb7 ("RISC-V: Build Infrastructure")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240705170210.3236-1-jszhang@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit 0c710050c47d45eb77b28c271cddefc5c785cb40 ]
Handle VM_FAULT_SIGSEGV in the page fault path so that we correctly
kill the process and we don't BUG() the kernel.
Fixes: 07037db5d479 ("RISC-V: Paging and MMU")
Signed-off-by: Zhe Qiao <qiaozhe@iscas.ac.cn>
Reviewed-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240731084547.85380-1-qiaozhe@iscas.ac.cn
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit a18b14d8886614b3c7d290c4cfc33389822b0535 upstream.
riscv uses the value of TSK_STACK_CANARY to set
stack-protector-guard-offset. With GCC_PLUGIN_RANDSTRUCT enabled, that
value is non-deterministic, and with riscv:allmodconfig often results
in build errors such as
cc1: error: '8120' is not a valid offset in '-mstack-protector-guard-offset='
Enable STACKPROTECTOR_PER_TASK only if GCC_PLUGIN_RANDSTRUCT is disabled
to fix the problem.
Fixes: fea2fed201ee5 ("riscv: Enable per-task stack canaries")
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit 6065e736f82c817c9a597a31ee67f0ce4628e948 ]
On NOMMU, userspace memory can come from anywhere in physical RAM. The
current definition of TASK_SIZE is wrong if any RAM exists above 4G,
causing spurious failures in the userspace access routines.
Fixes: 6bd33e1ece52 ("riscv: add nommu support")
Fixes: c3f896dcf1e4 ("mm: switch the test_vmalloc module to use __vmalloc_node")
Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@sifive.com>
Reviewed-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Bo Gan <ganboing@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240227003630.3634533-2-samuel.holland@sifive.com
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit ac88ff6b9d7dea9f0907c86bdae204dde7d5c0e6 ]
When below config items are set, compiler complained:
--------------------
CONFIG_CRASH_CORE=y
CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE=y
CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP=y
......
-----------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------
arch/riscv/kernel/crash_core.c: In function 'arch_crash_save_vmcoreinfo':
arch/riscv/kernel/crash_core.c:11:58: warning: format '%lx' expects argument of type 'long unsigned int', but argument 2 has type 'int' [-Wformat=]
11 | vmcoreinfo_append_str("NUMBER(VMALLOC_START)=0x%lx\n", VMALLOC_START);
| ~~^
| |
| long unsigned int
| %x
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is because on riscv macro VMALLOC_START has different type when
CONFIG_MMU is set or unset.
arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h:
--------------------------------------------------
Changing it to _AC(0, UL) in case CONFIG_MMU=n can fix the warning.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/ZW7OsX4zQRA3mO4+@MiWiFi-R3L-srv
Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> # build-tested
Cc: Eric DeVolder <eric_devolder@yahoo.com>
Cc: Ignat Korchagin <ignat@cloudflare.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
Cc: Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Stable-dep-of: 6065e736f82c ("riscv: Fix TASK_SIZE on 64-bit NOMMU")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit d14fa1fcf69db9d070e75f1c4425211fa619dfc8 ]
childregs represents the registers which are active for the new thread
in user context. For a kernel thread, childregs->gp is never used since
the kernel gp is not touched by switch_to. For a user mode helper, the
gp value can be observed in user space after execve or possibly by other
means.
[From the email thread]
The /* Kernel thread */ comment is somewhat inaccurate in that it is also used
for user_mode_helper threads, which exec a user process, e.g. /sbin/init or
when /proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern is a pipe. Such threads do not have
PF_KTHREAD set and are valid targets for ptrace etc. even before they exec.
childregs is the *user* context during syscall execution and it is observable
from userspace in at least five ways:
1. kernel_execve does not currently clear integer registers, so the starting
register state for PID 1 and other user processes started by the kernel has
sp = user stack, gp = kernel __global_pointer$, all other integer registers
zeroed by the memset in the patch comment.
This is a bug in its own right, but I'm unwilling to bet that it is the only
way to exploit the issue addressed by this patch.
2. ptrace(PTRACE_GETREGSET): you can PTRACE_ATTACH to a user_mode_helper thread
before it execs, but ptrace requires SIGSTOP to be delivered which can only
happen at user/kernel boundaries.
3. /proc/*/task/*/syscall: this is perfectly happy to read pt_regs for
user_mode_helpers before the exec completes, but gp is not one of the
registers it returns.
4. PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_USER: LOCKDOWN_PERF normally prevents access to kernel
addresses via PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_INTR, but due to this bug kernel addresses
are also exposed via PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_USER which is permitted under
LOCKDOWN_PERF. I have not attempted to write exploit code.
5. Much of the tracing infrastructure allows access to user registers. I have
not attempted to determine which forms of tracing allow access to user
registers without already allowing access to kernel registers.
Fixes: 7db91e57a0ac ("RISC-V: Task implementation")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Stefan O'Rear <sorear@fastmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240327061258.2370291-1-sorear@fastmail.com
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit fea2fed201ee5647699018a56fbb6a5e8cc053a5 ]
This enables the use of per-task stack canary values if GCC has
support for emitting the stack canary reference relative to the
value of tp, which holds the task struct pointer in the riscv
kernel.
After compare arm64 and x86 implementations, seems arm64's is more
flexible and readable. The key point is how gcc get the offset of
stack_canary from gs/el0_sp.
x86: Use a fix offset from gs, not flexible.
struct fixed_percpu_data {
/*
* GCC hardcodes the stack canary as %gs:40. Since the
* irq_stack is the object at %gs:0, we reserve the bottom
* 48 bytes of the irq stack for the canary.
*/
char gs_base[40]; // :(
unsigned long stack_canary;
};
arm64: Use -mstack-protector-guard-offset & guard-reg
gcc options:
-mstack-protector-guard=sysreg
-mstack-protector-guard-reg=sp_el0
-mstack-protector-guard-offset=xxx
riscv: Use -mstack-protector-guard-offset & guard-reg
gcc options:
-mstack-protector-guard=tls
-mstack-protector-guard-reg=tp
-mstack-protector-guard-offset=xxx
GCC's implementation has been merged:
commit c931e8d5a96463427040b0d11f9c4352ac22b2b0
Author: Cooper Qu <cooper.qu@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Mon Jul 13 16:15:08 2020 +0800
RISC-V: Add support for TLS stack protector canary access
In the end, these codes are inserted by gcc before return:
* 0xffffffe00020b396 <+120>: ld a5,1008(tp) # 0x3f0
* 0xffffffe00020b39a <+124>: xor a5,a5,a4
* 0xffffffe00020b39c <+126>: mv a0,s5
* 0xffffffe00020b39e <+128>: bnez a5,0xffffffe00020b61c <_do_fork+766>
0xffffffe00020b3a2 <+132>: ld ra,136(sp)
0xffffffe00020b3a4 <+134>: ld s0,128(sp)
0xffffffe00020b3a6 <+136>: ld s1,120(sp)
0xffffffe00020b3a8 <+138>: ld s2,112(sp)
0xffffffe00020b3aa <+140>: ld s3,104(sp)
0xffffffe00020b3ac <+142>: ld s4,96(sp)
0xffffffe00020b3ae <+144>: ld s5,88(sp)
0xffffffe00020b3b0 <+146>: ld s6,80(sp)
0xffffffe00020b3b2 <+148>: ld s7,72(sp)
0xffffffe00020b3b4 <+150>: addi sp,sp,144
0xffffffe00020b3b6 <+152>: ret
...
* 0xffffffe00020b61c <+766>: auipc ra,0x7f8
* 0xffffffe00020b620 <+770>: jalr -1764(ra) # 0xffffffe000a02f38 <__stack_chk_fail>
Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Cooper Qu <cooper.qu@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@google.com>
Stable-dep-of: d14fa1fcf69d ("riscv: process: Fix kernel gp leakage")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit d080a08b06b6266cc3e0e86c5acfd80db937cb6b upstream.
These macros did not initialize __kr_err, so they could fail even if
the access did not fault.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: d464118cdc41 ("riscv: implement __get_kernel_nofault and __put_user_nofault")
Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@sifive.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@rivosinc.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240312022030.320789-1-samuel.holland@sifive.com
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit a11dd49dcb9376776193e15641f84fcc1e5980c9 ]
Offset vmemmap so that the first page of vmemmap will be mapped
to the first page of physical memory in order to ensure that
vmemmap’s bounds will be respected during
pfn_to_page()/page_to_pfn() operations.
The conversion macros will produce correct SV39/48/57 addresses
for every possible/valid DRAM_BASE inside the physical memory limits.
v2:Address Alex's comments
Suggested-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Dimitris Vlachos <dvlachos@ics.forth.gr>
Reported-by: Dimitris Vlachos <dvlachos@ics.forth.gr>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20240202135030.42265-1-csd4492@csd.uoc.gr
Fixes: d95f1a542c3d ("RISC-V: Implement sparsemem")
Reviewed-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240229191723.32779-1-dvlachos@ics.forth.gr
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 22e0eb04837a63af111fae35a92f7577676b9bc8 ]
This is a backport of a fix that was done in OpenSBI: ec0559eb315b
("lib: sbi_misaligned_ldst: Fix handling of C.SWSP and C.SDSP").
Unlike C.LWSP/C.LDSP, these encodings can be used with the zero
register, so checking that the rs2 field is non-zero is unnecessary.
Additionally, the previous check was incorrect since it was checking
the immediate field of the instruction instead of the rs2 field.
Fixes: 956d705dd279 ("riscv: Unaligned load/store handling for M_MODE")
Signed-off-by: Clément Léger <cleger@rivosinc.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231103090223.702340-1-cleger@rivosinc.com
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 2f1b0d3d733169eb11680bfa97c266ae5e757148 ]
The RISC-V architecture does not expose sub-registers, and hold all
32-bit values in a sign-extended format [1] [2]:
| The compiler and calling convention maintain an invariant that all
| 32-bit values are held in a sign-extended format in 64-bit
| registers. Even 32-bit unsigned integers extend bit 31 into bits
| 63 through 32. Consequently, conversion between unsigned and
| signed 32-bit integers is a no-op, as is conversion from a signed
| 32-bit integer to a signed 64-bit integer.
While BPF, on the other hand, exposes sub-registers, and use
zero-extension (similar to arm64/x86).
This has led to some subtle bugs, where a BPF JITted program has not
sign-extended the a0 register (return value in RISC-V land), passed
the return value up the kernel, e.g.:
| int from_bpf(void);
|
| long foo(void)
| {
| return from_bpf();
| }
Here, a0 would be 0xffff_ffff, instead of the expected
0xffff_ffff_ffff_ffff.
Internally, the RISC-V JIT uses a5 as a dedicated register for BPF
return values.
Keep a5 zero-extended, but explicitly sign-extend a0 (which is used
outside BPF land). Now that a0 (RISC-V ABI) and a5 (BPF ABI) differs,
a0 is only moved to a5 for non-BPF native calls (BPF_PSEUDO_CALL).
Fixes: 2353ecc6f91f ("bpf, riscv: add BPF JIT for RV64G")
Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://github.com/riscv/riscv-isa-manual/releases/download/riscv-isa-release-056b6ff-2023-10-02/unpriv-isa-asciidoc.pdf # [2]
Link: https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-elf-psabi-doc/releases/download/draft-20230929-e5c800e661a53efe3c2678d71a306323b60eb13b/riscv-abi.pdf # [2]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231004120706.52848-2-bjorn@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 0fd1fd0104954380477353aea29c347e85dff16d ]
The current emit_call function is not suitable for kernel function call as
it store return value to bpf R0 register. We can separate it out for common
use. Meanwhile, simplify judgment logic, that is, fixed function address
can use jal or auipc+jalr, while the unfixed can use only auipc+jalr.
Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Tested-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com>
Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230215135205.1411105-3-pulehui@huaweicloud.com
Stable-dep-of: 2f1b0d3d7331 ("riscv, bpf: Sign-extend return values")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
