[ Upstream commit cd42ba1c8ac9deb9032add6adf491110e7442040 ]
This came while reviewing commit c4e86b4363ac ("net: add two more
call_rcu_hurry()").
Paolo asked if adding one synchronize_rcu() would help.
While synchronize_rcu() does not help, making sure to call
rcu_barrier() before msleep(wait) is definitely helping
to make sure lazy call_rcu() are completed.
Instead of waiting ~100 seconds in my tests, the ref_tracker
splats occurs one time only, and netdev_wait_allrefs_any()
latency is reduced to the strict minimum.
Ideally we should audit our call_rcu() users to make sure
no refcount (or cascading call_rcu()) is held too long,
because rcu_barrier() is quite expensive.
Fixes: 0e4be9e57e8c ("net: use exponential backoff in netdev_wait_allrefs")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/28bbf698-befb-42f6-b561-851c67f464aa@kernel.org/T/#m76d73ed6b03cd930778ac4d20a777f22a08d6824
Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit b5f0de6df6dce8d641ef58ef7012f3304dffb9a1 ]
One of the worst offenders of "fake flexible arrays" is struct sockaddr,
as it is the classic example of why GCC and Clang have been traditionally
forced to treat all trailing arrays as fake flexible arrays: in the
distant misty past, sa_data became too small, and code started just
treating it as a flexible array, even though it was fixed-size. The
special case by the compiler is specifically that sizeof(sa->sa_data)
and FORTIFY_SOURCE (which uses __builtin_object_size(sa->sa_data, 1))
do not agree (14 and -1 respectively), which makes FORTIFY_SOURCE treat
it as a flexible array.
However, the coming -fstrict-flex-arrays compiler flag will remove
these special cases so that FORTIFY_SOURCE can gain coverage over all
the trailing arrays in the kernel that are _not_ supposed to be treated
as a flexible array. To deal with this change, convert sa_data to a true
flexible array. To keep the structure size the same, move sa_data into
a union with a newly introduced sa_data_min with the original size. The
result is that FORTIFY_SOURCE can continue to have no idea how large
sa_data may actually be, but anything using sizeof(sa->sa_data) must
switch to sizeof(sa->sa_data_min).
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>
Cc: Dylan Yudaken <dylany@fb.com>
Cc: Yajun Deng <yajun.deng@linux.dev>
Cc: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Cc: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Cc: syzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com>
Cc: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018095503.never.671-kees@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Stable-dep-of: a7d6027790ac ("arp: Prevent overflow in arp_req_get().")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 24ab059d2ebd62fdccc43794796f6ffbabe49ebc ]
Some drivers might misbehave if TSO packets get too big.
GVE for instance uses a 16bit field in its TX descriptor,
and will do bad things if a packet is bigger than 2^16 bytes.
Linux TCP stack honors dev->gso_max_size, but there are
other ways for too big packets to reach an ndo_start_xmit()
handler : virtio_net, af_packet, GRO...
Add a generic check in gso_features_check() and fallback
to GSO when needed.
gso_max_size was added in the blamed commit.
Fixes: 82cc1a7a5687 ("[NET]: Add per-connection option to set max TSO frame size")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231219125331.4127498-1-edumazet@google.com
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 1d155dfdf50efc2b0793bce93c06d1a5b23d0877 ]
In bug report [0] a warning in r8169 driver was reported that was
caused by an invalid GSO SKB (gso_type was 0). See [1] for a discussion
about this issue. Still the origin of the invalid GSO SKB isn't clear.
It shouldn't be a network drivers task to check for invalid GSO SKB's.
Also, even if issue [0] can be fixed, we can't be sure that a
similar issue doesn't pop up again at another place.
Therefore let gso_features_check() check for such invalid GSO SKB's.
[0] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=209423
[1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg690794.html
Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/97c78d21-7f0b-d843-df17-3589f224d2cf@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Stable-dep-of: 24ab059d2ebd ("net: check dev->gso_max_size in gso_features_check()")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
