[ Upstream commit 35025963326e44d8bced3eecd42d2f040f4f0024 ]
The starting iova address to iterate iotlb map entry within a range
was set to an irrelevant value when passing to the itree_next()
iterator, although luckily it doesn't affect the outcome of finding
out the granule of the smallest iotlb map size. Fix the code to make
it consistent with the following for-loop.
Fixes: 94abbccdf291 ("vdpa/mlx5: Add shared memory registration code")
Signed-off-by: Si-Wei Liu <si-wei.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Dragos Tatulea <dtatulea@nvidia.com>
Message-Id: <20241021134040.975221-3-dtatulea@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 29ce8b8a4fa74e841342c8b8f8941848a3c6f29f upstream.
When calculating the physical address range based on the iotlb and mr
[start,end) ranges, the offset of mr->start relative to map->start
is not taken into account. This leads to some incorrect and duplicate
mappings.
For the case when mr->start < map->start the code is already correct:
the range in [mr->start, map->start) was handled by a different
iteration.
Fixes: 94abbccdf291 ("vdpa/mlx5: Add shared memory registration code")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Si-Wei Liu <si-wei.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Dragos Tatulea <dtatulea@nvidia.com>
Message-Id: <20241021134040.975221-2-dtatulea@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
