[ Upstream commit 9147b9ded499d9853bdf0e9804b7eaa99c4429ed ]
Jens reported the following warnings from -Wmaybe-uninitialized recent
Linus' branch.
In file included from ./include/asm-generic/rwonce.h:26,
from ./arch/arm64/include/asm/rwonce.h:71,
from ./include/linux/compiler.h:246,
from ./include/linux/export.h:5,
from ./include/linux/linkage.h:7,
from ./include/linux/kernel.h:17,
from fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:6:
In function ‘instrument_copy_from_user_before’,
inlined from ‘_copy_from_user’ at ./include/linux/uaccess.h:148:3,
inlined from ‘copy_from_user’ at ./include/linux/uaccess.h:183:7,
inlined from ‘btrfs_ioctl_space_info’ at fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:2999:6,
inlined from ‘btrfs_ioctl’ at fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4616:10:
./include/linux/kasan-checks.h:38:27: warning: ‘space_args’ may be used
uninitialized [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
38 | #define kasan_check_write __kasan_check_write
./include/linux/instrumented.h:129:9: note: in expansion of macro
‘kasan_check_write’
129 | kasan_check_write(to, n);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/kasan-checks.h: In function ‘btrfs_ioctl’:
./include/linux/kasan-checks.h:20:6: note: by argument 1 of type ‘const
volatile void *’ to ‘__kasan_check_write’ declared here
20 | bool __kasan_check_write(const volatile void *p, unsigned int
size);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:2981:39: note: ‘space_args’ declared here
2981 | struct btrfs_ioctl_space_args space_args;
| ^~~~~~~~~~
In function ‘instrument_copy_from_user_before’,
inlined from ‘_copy_from_user’ at ./include/linux/uaccess.h:148:3,
inlined from ‘copy_from_user’ at ./include/linux/uaccess.h:183:7,
inlined from ‘_btrfs_ioctl_send’ at fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4343:9,
inlined from ‘btrfs_ioctl’ at fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4658:10:
./include/linux/kasan-checks.h:38:27: warning: ‘args32’ may be used
uninitialized [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
38 | #define kasan_check_write __kasan_check_write
./include/linux/instrumented.h:129:9: note: in expansion of macro
‘kasan_check_write’
129 | kasan_check_write(to, n);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/kasan-checks.h: In function ‘btrfs_ioctl’:
./include/linux/kasan-checks.h:20:6: note: by argument 1 of type ‘const
volatile void *’ to ‘__kasan_check_write’ declared here
20 | bool __kasan_check_write(const volatile void *p, unsigned int
size);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4341:49: note: ‘args32’ declared here
4341 | struct btrfs_ioctl_send_args_32 args32;
| ^~~~~~
This was due to his config options and having KASAN turned on,
which adds some extra checks around copy_from_user(), which then
triggered the -Wmaybe-uninitialized checker for these cases.
Fix the warnings by initializing the different structs we're copying
into.
Reported-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit b4c639f699349880b7918b861e1bd360442ec450 ]
Jens reported a compiler warning when using
CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=y that looks like this
fs/btrfs/tree-log.c: In function ‘btrfs_log_prealloc_extents’:
fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:4828:23: warning: ‘start_slot’ may be used
uninitialized [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
4828 | ret = copy_items(trans, inode, dst_path, path,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
4829 | start_slot, ins_nr, 1, 0);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:4725:13: note: ‘start_slot’ was declared here
4725 | int start_slot;
| ^~~~~~~~~~
The compiler is incorrect, as we only use this code when ins_len > 0,
and when ins_len > 0 we have start_slot properly initialized. However
we generally find the -Wmaybe-uninitialized warnings valuable, so
initialize start_slot to get rid of the warning.
Reported-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Tested-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 1bf76df3fee56d6637718e267f7c34ed70d0c7dc ]
When running a delayed tree reference, if we find a ref count different
from 1, we return -EIO. This isn't an IO error, as it indicates either a
bug in the delayed refs code or a memory corruption, so change the error
code from -EIO to -EUCLEAN. Also tag the branch as 'unlikely' as this is
not expected to ever happen, and change the error message to print the
tree block's bytenr without the parenthesis (and there was a missing space
between the 'block' word and the opening parenthesis), for consistency as
that's the style we used everywhere else.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
