[ Upstream commit b8f85833c05730d631576008daaa34096bc7f3ce ]
The exit() callback is optional and shouldn't be called without checking
a valid pointer first.
Also, we must clear freq_table pointer even if the exit() callback isn't
present.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Fixes: 91a12e91dc39 ("cpufreq: Allow light-weight tear down and bring up of CPUs")
Fixes: f339f3541701 ("cpufreq: Rearrange locking in cpufreq_remove_dev()")
Reported-by: Lizhe <sensor1010@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit f339f3541701d824a0256ad4bf14c26ceb6d79c3 ]
Currently, cpufreq_remove_dev() invokes the ->exit() driver callback
without holding the policy rwsem which is inconsistent with what
happens if ->exit() is invoked directly from cpufreq_offline().
It also manipulates the real_cpus mask and removes the CPU device
symlink without holding the policy rwsem, but cpufreq_offline() holds
the rwsem around the modifications thereof.
For consistency, modify cpufreq_remove_dev() to hold the policy rwsem
until the ->exit() callback has been called (or it has been determined
that it is not necessary to call it).
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Stable-dep-of: b8f85833c057 ("cpufreq: exit() callback is optional")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit fddd8f86dff4a24742a7f0322ccbb34c6c1c9850 ]
Split the "core" part running under the policy rwsem out of
cpufreq_offline() to allow the locking in cpufreq_remove_dev() to be
rearranged more easily.
As a side-effect this eliminates the unlock label that's not needed
any more.
No expected functional impact.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Stable-dep-of: b8f85833c057 ("cpufreq: exit() callback is optional")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit e1e962c5b9edbc628a335bcdbd010331a12d3e5b ]
Notice that cpufreq_offline() only needs to check policy_is_inactive()
once and rearrange the code in there to make that happen.
No expected functional impact.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Stable-dep-of: b8f85833c057 ("cpufreq: exit() callback is optional")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
