[ Upstream commit d5c4546062fd6f5dbce575c7ea52ad66d1968678 ]
According to Vinicius (and carefully looking through the whole
https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=b65e0af58423fc8a73aa
once again), txtime branch of 'taprio_change()' is not going to
race against 'advance_sched()'. But using 'rcu_replace_pointer()'
in the former may be a good idea as well.
Suggested-by: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Antipov <dmantipov@yandex.ru>
Acked-by: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit f921a58ae20852d188f70842431ce6519c4fdc36 ]
If one TCA_TAPRIO_ATTR_PRIOMAP attribute has been provided,
taprio_parse_mqprio_opt() must validate it, or userspace
can inject arbitrary data to the kernel, the second time
taprio_change() is called.
First call (with valid attributes) sets dev->num_tc
to a non zero value.
Second call (with arbitrary mqprio attributes)
returns early from taprio_parse_mqprio_opt()
and bad things can happen.
Fixes: a3d43c0d56f1 ("taprio: Add support adding an admin schedule")
Reported-by: Noam Rathaus <noamr@ssd-disclosure.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Acked-by: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240604181511.769870-1-edumazet@google.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
