commit 62c0b1061593d7012292f781f11145b2d46f43ab upstream.
In perf_adjust_period, we will first calculate period, and then use
this period to calculate delta. However, when delta is less than 0,
there will be a deviation compared to when delta is greater than or
equal to 0. For example, when delta is in the range of [-14,-1], the
range of delta = delta + 7 is between [-7,6], so the final value of
delta/8 is 0. Therefore, the impact of -1 and -2 will be ignored.
This is unacceptable when the target period is very short, because
we will lose a lot of samples.
Here are some tests and analyzes:
before:
# perf record -e cs -F 1000 ./a.out
[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.022 MB perf.data (518 samples) ]
# perf script
...
a.out 396 257.956048: 23 cs: ffffffff81f4eeec schedul>
a.out 396 257.957891: 23 cs: ffffffff81f4eeec schedul>
a.out 396 257.959730: 23 cs: ffffffff81f4eeec schedul>
a.out 396 257.961545: 23 cs: ffffffff81f4eeec schedul>
a.out 396 257.963355: 23 cs: ffffffff81f4eeec schedul>
a.out 396 257.965163: 23 cs: ffffffff81f4eeec schedul>
a.out 396 257.966973: 23 cs: ffffffff81f4eeec schedul>
a.out 396 257.968785: 23 cs: ffffffff81f4eeec schedul>
a.out 396 257.970593: 23 cs: ffffffff81f4eeec schedul>
...
after:
# perf record -e cs -F 1000 ./a.out
[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.058 MB perf.data (1466 samples) ]
# perf script
...
a.out 395 59.338813: 11 cs: ffffffff81f4eeec schedul>
a.out 395 59.339707: 12 cs: ffffffff81f4eeec schedul>
a.out 395 59.340682: 13 cs: ffffffff81f4eeec schedul>
a.out 395 59.341751: 13 cs: ffffffff81f4eeec schedul>
a.out 395 59.342799: 12 cs: ffffffff81f4eeec schedul>
a.out 395 59.343765: 11 cs: ffffffff81f4eeec schedul>
a.out 395 59.344651: 11 cs: ffffffff81f4eeec schedul>
a.out 395 59.345539: 12 cs: ffffffff81f4eeec schedul>
a.out 395 59.346502: 13 cs: ffffffff81f4eeec schedul>
...
test.c
int main() {
for (int i = 0; i < 20000; i++)
usleep(10);
return 0;
}
# time ./a.out
real 0m1.583s
user 0m0.040s
sys 0m0.298s
The above results were tested on x86-64 qemu with KVM enabled using
test.c as test program. Ideally, we should have around 1500 samples,
but the previous algorithm had only about 500, whereas the modified
algorithm now has about 1400. Further more, the new version shows 1
sample per 0.001s, while the previous one is 1 sample per 0.002s.This
indicates that the new algorithm is more sensitive to small negative
values compared to old algorithm.
Fixes: bd2b5b12849a ("perf_counter: More aggressive frequency adjustment")
Signed-off-by: Luo Gengkun <luogengkun@huaweicloud.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240831074316.2106159-2-luogengkun@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 2ab9d830262c132ab5db2f571003d80850d56b2a upstream.
Ole reported that event->mmap_mutex is strictly insufficient to
serialize the AUX buffer, add a per RB mutex to fully serialize it.
Note that in the lock order comment the perf_event::mmap_mutex order
was already wrong, that is, it nesting under mmap_lock is not new with
this patch.
Fixes: 45bfb2e50471 ("perf: Add AUX area to ring buffer for raw data streams")
Reported-by: Ole <ole@binarygecko.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit dbc48c8f41c208082cfa95e973560134489e3309 ]
nr_pages is unsigned long but gets passed to rb_alloc_aux() as an int,
and is stored as an int.
Only power-of-2 values are accepted, so if nr_pages is a 64_bit value, it
will be passed to rb_alloc_aux() as zero.
That is not ideal because:
1. the value is incorrect
2. rb_alloc_aux() is at risk of misbehaving, although it manages to
return -ENOMEM in that case, it is a result of passing zero to get_order()
even though the get_order() result is documented to be undefined in that
case.
Fix by simply validating the maximum supported value in the first place.
Use -ENOMEM error code for consistency with the current error code that
is returned in that case.
Fixes: 45bfb2e50471 ("perf: Add AUX area to ring buffer for raw data streams")
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240624201101.60186-6-adrian.hunter@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 74751ef5c1912ebd3e65c3b65f45587e05ce5d36 ]
In our production environment, we found many hung tasks which are
blocked for more than 18 hours. Their call traces are like this:
[346278.191038] __schedule+0x2d8/0x890
[346278.191046] schedule+0x4e/0xb0
[346278.191049] perf_event_free_task+0x220/0x270
[346278.191056] ? init_wait_var_entry+0x50/0x50
[346278.191060] copy_process+0x663/0x18d0
[346278.191068] kernel_clone+0x9d/0x3d0
[346278.191072] __do_sys_clone+0x5d/0x80
[346278.191076] __x64_sys_clone+0x25/0x30
[346278.191079] do_syscall_64+0x5c/0xc0
[346278.191083] ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x27/0x50
[346278.191086] ? do_syscall_64+0x69/0xc0
[346278.191088] ? irqentry_exit_to_user_mode+0x9/0x20
[346278.191092] ? irqentry_exit+0x19/0x30
[346278.191095] ? exc_page_fault+0x89/0x160
[346278.191097] ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x8/0x30
[346278.191102] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
The task was waiting for the refcount become to 1, but from the vmcore,
we found the refcount has already been 1. It seems that the task didn't
get woken up by perf_event_release_kernel() and got stuck forever. The
below scenario may cause the problem.
Thread A Thread B
... ...
perf_event_free_task perf_event_release_kernel
...
acquire event->child_mutex
...
get_ctx
... release event->child_mutex
acquire ctx->mutex
...
perf_free_event (acquire/release event->child_mutex)
...
release ctx->mutex
wait_var_event
acquire ctx->mutex
acquire event->child_mutex
# move existing events to free_list
release event->child_mutex
release ctx->mutex
put_ctx
... ...
In this case, all events of the ctx have been freed, so we couldn't
find the ctx in free_list and Thread A will miss the wakeup. It's thus
necessary to add a wakeup after dropping the reference.
Fixes: 1cf8dfe8a661 ("perf/core: Fix race between close() and fork()")
Signed-off-by: Haifeng Xu <haifeng.xu@shopee.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240513103948.33570-1-haifeng.xu@shopee.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 6b959ba22d34ca793ffdb15b5715457c78e38b1a upstream.
perf_output_read_group may respond to IPI request of other cores and invoke
__perf_install_in_context function. As a result, hwc configuration is modified.
causing inconsistency and unexpected consequences.
Interrupts are not disabled when perf_output_read_group reads PMU counter.
In this case, IPI request may be received from other cores.
As a result, PMU configuration is modified and an error occurs when
reading PMU counter:
CPU0 CPU1
__se_sys_perf_event_open
perf_install_in_context
perf_output_read_group smp_call_function_single
for_each_sibling_event(sub, leader) { generic_exec_single
if ((sub != event) && remote_function
(sub->state == PERF_EVENT_STATE_ACTIVE)) |
<enter IPI handler: __perf_install_in_context> <----RAISE IPI-----+
__perf_install_in_context
ctx_resched
event_sched_out
armpmu_del
...
hwc->idx = -1; // event->hwc.idx is set to -1
...
<exit IPI>
sub->pmu->read(sub);
armpmu_read
armv8pmu_read_counter
armv8pmu_read_hw_counter
int idx = event->hw.idx; // idx = -1
u64 val = armv8pmu_read_evcntr(idx);
u32 counter = ARMV8_IDX_TO_COUNTER(idx); // invalid counter = 30
read_pmevcntrn(counter) // undefined instruction
Signed-off-by: Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220902082918.179248-1-yangjihong1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@igalia.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit 388a1fb7da6aaa1970c7e2a7d7fcd983a87a8484 ]
Thomas reported that commit 652ffc2104ec ("perf/core: Fix narrow
startup race when creating the perf nr_addr_filters sysfs file") made
the entire attribute group vanish, instead of only the nr_addr_filters
attribute.
Additionally a stray return.
Insufficient coffee was involved with both writing and merging the
patch.
Fixes: 652ffc2104ec ("perf/core: Fix narrow startup race when creating the perf nr_addr_filters sysfs file")
Reported-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231122100756.GP8262@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 7e2c1e4b34f07d9aa8937fab88359d4a0fce468e upstream.
When lockdep is enabled, the for_each_sibling_event(sibling, event)
macro checks that event->ctx->mutex is held. When creating a new group
leader event, we call perf_event_validate_size() on a partially
initialized event where event->ctx is NULL, and so when
for_each_sibling_event() attempts to check event->ctx->mutex, we get a
splat, as reported by Lucas De Marchi:
WARNING: CPU: 8 PID: 1471 at kernel/events/core.c:1950 __do_sys_perf_event_open+0xf37/0x1080
This only happens for a new event which is its own group_leader, and in
this case there cannot be any sibling events. Thus it's safe to skip the
check for siblings, which avoids having to make invasive and ugly
changes to for_each_sibling_event().
Avoid the splat by bailing out early when the new event is its own
group_leader.
Fixes: 382c27f4ed28f803 ("perf: Fix perf_event_validate_size()")
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20231214000620.3081018-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com/
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ZXpm6gQ%2Fd59jGsuW@xpf.sh.intel.com/
Reported-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reported-by: Pengfei Xu <pengfei.xu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231215112450.3972309-1-mark.rutland@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit 382c27f4ed28f803b1f1473ac2d8db0afc795a1b ]
Budimir noted that perf_event_validate_size() only checks the size of
the newly added event, even though the sizes of all existing events
can also change due to not all events having the same read_format.
When we attach the new event, perf_group_attach(), we do re-compute
the size for all events.
Fixes: a723968c0ed3 ("perf: Fix u16 overflows")
Reported-by: Budimir Markovic <markovicbudimir@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 119a784c81270eb88e573174ed2209225d646656 ]
Sometimes we want to know an accurate number of samples even if it's
lost. Currenlty PERF_RECORD_LOST is generated for a ring-buffer which
might be shared with other events. So it's hard to know per-event
lost count.
Add event->lost_samples field and PERF_FORMAT_LOST to retrieve it from
userspace.
Original-patch-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220616180623.1358843-1-namhyung@kernel.org
Stable-dep-of: 382c27f4ed28 ("perf: Fix perf_event_validate_size()")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 32671e3799ca2e4590773fd0e63aaa4229e50c06 upstream.
Because group consistency is non-atomic between parent (filedesc) and children
(inherited) events, it is possible for PERF_FORMAT_GROUP read() to try and sum
non-matching counter groups -- with non-sensical results.
Add group_generation to distinguish the case where a parent group removes and
adds an event and thus has the same number, but a different configuration of
events as inherited groups.
This became a problem when commit fa8c269353d5 ("perf/core: Invert
perf_read_group() loops") flipped the order of child_list and sibling_list.
Previously it would iterate the group (sibling_list) first, and for each
sibling traverse the child_list. In this order, only the group composition of
the parent is relevant. By flipping the order the group composition of the
child (inherited) events becomes an issue and the mis-match in group
composition becomes evident.
That said; even prior to this commit, while reading of a group that is not
equally inherited was not broken, it still made no sense.
(Ab)use ECHILD as error return to indicate issues with child process group
composition.
Fixes: fa8c269353d5 ("perf/core: Invert perf_read_group() loops")
Reported-by: Budimir Markovic <markovicbudimir@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231018115654.GK33217@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
