Commit graph

9 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Ksawlii
605451724a Revert "s390/facility: Disable compile time optimization for decompressor code"
This reverts commit f66d16cd53.
2024-11-24 00:22:59 +01:00
Heiko Carstens
ef949e86da s390: Initialize psw mask in perf_arch_fetch_caller_regs()
[ Upstream commit 223e7fb979fa06934f1595b6ad0ae1d4ead1147f ]

Also initialize regs->psw.mask in perf_arch_fetch_caller_regs().
This way user_mode(regs) will return false, like it should.

It looks like all current users initialize regs to zero, so that this
doesn't fix a bug currently. However it is better to not rely on callers
to do this.

Fixes: 914d52e46490 ("s390: implement perf_arch_fetch_caller_regs")
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2024-11-23 23:21:59 +01:00
Heiko Carstens
f66d16cd53 s390/facility: Disable compile time optimization for decompressor code
[ Upstream commit 0147addc4fb72a39448b8873d8acdf3a0f29aa65 ]

Disable compile time optimizations of test_facility() for the
decompressor. The decompressor should not contain any optimized code
depending on the architecture level set the kernel image is compiled
for to avoid unexpected operation exceptions.

Add a __DECOMPRESSOR check to test_facility() to enforce that
facilities are always checked during runtime for the decompressor.

Reviewed-by: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2024-11-23 23:21:49 +01:00
Claudio Imbrenda
b332d90ade s390/uv: Panic for set and remove shared access UVC errors
[ Upstream commit cff59d8631e1409ffdd22d9d717e15810181b32c ]

The return value uv_set_shared() and uv_remove_shared() (which are
wrappers around the share() function) is not always checked. The system
integrity of a protected guest depends on the Share and Unshare UVCs
being successful. This means that any caller that fails to check the
return value will compromise the security of the protected guest.

No code path that would lead to such violation of the security
guarantees is currently exercised, since all the areas that are shared
never get unshared during the lifetime of the system. This might
change and become an issue in the future.

The Share and Unshare UVCs can only fail in case of hypervisor
misbehaviour (either a bug or malicious behaviour). In such cases there
is no reasonable way forward, and the system needs to panic.

This patch replaces the return at the end of the share() function with
a panic, to guarantee system integrity.

Fixes: 5abb9351dfd9 ("s390/uv: introduce guest side ultravisor code")
Signed-off-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240801112548.85303-1-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com
Message-ID: <20240801112548.85303-1-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
[frankja@linux.ibm.com: Fixed up patch subject]
Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2024-11-23 23:20:43 +01:00
Sven Schnelle
769153ed1d s390: Mark psw in __load_psw_mask() as __unitialized
[ Upstream commit 7278a8fb8d032dfdc03d9b5d17e0bc451cdc1492 ]

Without __unitialized, the following code is generated when
INIT_STACK_ALL_ZERO is enabled:

86: d7 0f f0 a0 f0 a0     xc      160(16,%r15), 160(%r15)
8c: e3 40 f0 a0 00 24     stg     %r4, 160(%r15)
92: c0 10 00 00 00 08     larl    %r1, 0xa2
98: e3 10 f0 a8 00 24     stg     %r1, 168(%r15)
9e: b2 b2 f0 a0           lpswe   160(%r15)

The xc is not adding any security because psw is fully initialized
with the following instructions. Add __unitialized to the psw
definitiation to avoid the superfluous clearing of psw.

Reviewed-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2024-11-19 14:19:44 +01:00
Jens Remus
3497c0bec9 s390/vdso: Add CFI for RA register to asm macro vdso_func
[ Upstream commit b961ec10b9f9719987470236feb50c967db5a652 ]

The return-address (RA) register r14 is specified as volatile in the
s390x ELF ABI [1]. Nevertheless proper CFI directives must be provided
for an unwinder to restore the return address, if the RA register
value is changed from its value at function entry, as it is the case.

[1]: s390x ELF ABI, https://github.com/IBM/s390x-abi/releases

Fixes: 4bff8cb54502 ("s390: convert to GENERIC_VDSO")
Signed-off-by: Jens Remus <jremus@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2024-11-19 11:32:42 +01:00
Niklas Schnelle
3b98a26de2 s390/pci: fix max size calculation in zpci_memcpy_toio()
[ Upstream commit 80df7d6af7f6d229b34cf237b2cc9024c07111cd ]

The zpci_get_max_write_size() helper is used to determine the maximum
size a PCI store or load can use at a given __iomem address.

For the PCI block store the following restrictions apply:

1. The dst + len must not cross a 4K boundary in the (pseudo-)MMIO space
2. len must not exceed ZPCI_MAX_WRITE_SIZE
3. len must be a multiple of 8 bytes
4. The src address must be double word (8 byte) aligned
5. The dst address must be double word (8 byte) aligned

Otherwise only a normal PCI store which takes its src value from
a register can be used. For these PCI store restriction 1 still applies.
Similarly 1 also applies to PCI loads.

It turns out zpci_max_write_size() instead implements stricter
conditions which prevents PCI block stores from being used where they
can and should be used. In particular instead of conditions 4 and 5 it
wrongly enforces both dst and src to be size aligned. This indirectly
covers condition 1 but also prevents many legal PCI block stores.

On top of the functional shortcomings the zpci_get_max_write_size() is
misnamed as it is used for both read and write size calculations. Rename
it to zpci_get_max_io_size() and implement the listed conditions
explicitly.

Reviewed-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
Fixes: cd24834130ac ("s390/pci: base support")
Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
[agordeev@linux.ibm.com replaced spaces with tabs]
Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2024-11-18 12:12:50 +01:00
Heiko Carstens
21f365d2da s390/vx: fix save/restore of fpu kernel context
[ Upstream commit e6b2dab41888332bf83f592131e7ea07756770a4 ]

The KERNEL_FPR mask only contains a flag for the first eight vector
registers. However floating point registers overlay parts of the first
sixteen vector registers.

This could lead to vector register corruption if a kernel fpu context uses
any of the vector registers 8 to 15 and is interrupted or calls a
KERNEL_FPR context. If that context uses also vector registers 8 to 15,
their contents will be corrupted on return.

Luckily this is currently not a real bug, since the kernel has only one
KERNEL_FPR user with s390_adjust_jiffies() and it is only using floating
point registers 0 to 2.

Fix this by using the correct bits for KERNEL_FPR.

Fixes: 7f79695cc1b6 ("s390/fpu: improve kernel_fpu_[begin|end]")
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2024-11-18 12:11:58 +01:00
Gabriel2392
7ed7ee9edf Import A536BXXU9EXDC 2024-06-15 16:02:09 -03:00