[ Upstream commit 0568b6f0d863643db2edcc7be31165740c89fa82 ]
IPv6 checksum tests with unaligned addresses on 64-bit builds result
in unexpected failures.
Expected expected == csum_result, but
expected == 46591 (0xb5ff)
csum_result == 46381 (0xb52d)
with alignment offset 1
Oddly enough, the problem disappeared after adding test code into
the beginning of csum_ipv6_magic().
As it turns out, the 'sum' parameter of csum_ipv6_magic() is declared as
__wsum, which is a 32-bit variable. However, it is treated as 64-bit
variable in the 64-bit assembler code. Tests showed that the upper 32 bit
of the register used to pass the variable are _not_ cleared when entering
the function. This can result in checksum calculation errors.
Clearing the upper 32 bit of 'sum' as first operation in the assembler
code fixes the problem.
Acked-by: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 4b75b12d70506e31fc02356bbca60f8d5ca012d0 ]
hppa 64-bit systems calculates the IPv6 checksum using 64-bit add
operations. The last add folds protocol and length fields into the 64-bit
result. While unlikely, this operation can overflow. The overflow can be
triggered with a code sequence such as the following.
/* try to trigger massive overflows */
memset(tmp_buf, 0xff, sizeof(struct in6_addr));
csum_result = csum_ipv6_magic((struct in6_addr *)tmp_buf,
(struct in6_addr *)tmp_buf,
0xffff, 0xff, 0xffffffff);
Fix the problem by adding any overflows from the final add operation into
the calculated checksum. Fortunately, we can do this without additional
cost by replacing the add operation used to fold the checksum into 32 bit
with "add,dc" to add in the missing carry.
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Reviewed-by: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@rivosinc.com>
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 4408ba75e4ba80c91fde7e10bccccf388f5c09be ]
Calculating the IPv6 checksum on 32-bit systems missed overflows when
adding the proto+len fields into the checksum. This results in the
following unit test failure.
# test_csum_ipv6_magic: ASSERTION FAILED at lib/checksum_kunit.c:506
Expected ( u64)csum_result == ( u64)expected, but
( u64)csum_result == 46722 (0xb682)
( u64)expected == 46721 (0xb681)
not ok 5 test_csum_ipv6_magic
This is probably rarely seen in the real world because proto+len are
usually small values which will rarely result in overflows when calculating
the checksum. However, the unit test code uses large values for the length
field, causing the test to fail.
Fix the problem by adding the missing carry into the final checksum.
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Tested-by: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@rivosinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@rivosinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit a2abae8f0b638c31bb9799d9dd847306e0d005bd ]
IP checksum unit tests report the following error when run on hppa/hppa64.
# test_ip_fast_csum: ASSERTION FAILED at lib/checksum_kunit.c:463
Expected ( u64)csum_result == ( u64)expected, but
( u64)csum_result == 33754 (0x83da)
( u64)expected == 10946 (0x2ac2)
not ok 4 test_ip_fast_csum
0x83da is the expected result if the IP header length is 20 bytes. 0x2ac2
is the expected result if the IP header length is 24 bytes. The test fails
with an IP header length of 24 bytes. It appears that ip_fast_csum()
always returns the checksum for a 20-byte header, no matter how long
the header actually is.
Code analysis shows a suspicious assembler sequence in ip_fast_csum().
" addc %0, %3, %0\n"
"1: ldws,ma 4(%1), %3\n"
" addib,< 0, %2, 1b\n" <---
While my understanding of HPPA assembler is limited, it does not seem
to make much sense to subtract 0 from a register and to expect the result
to ever be negative. Subtracting 1 from the length parameter makes more
sense. On top of that, the operation should be repeated if and only if
the result is still > 0, so change the suspicious instruction to
" addib,> -1, %2, 1b\n"
The IP checksum unit test passes after this change.
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Tested-by: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@rivosinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@rivosinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 4603fbaa76b5e703b38ac8cc718102834eb6e330 ]
Use add,l to avoid clobbering the C/B bits in the PSW.
Signed-off-by: John David Anglin <dave.anglin@bell.net>
Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.10+
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
