[ Upstream commit 482db2f1dd211f73ad9d71e33ae15c1df6379982 ]
XFRM state doesn't need anything from flags except to understand
direction, so store it separately. For future patches, such change
will allow us to reuse xfrm_dev_offload for policy offload too, which
has three possible directions instead of two.
Reviewed-by: Raed Salem <raeds@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Stable-dep-of: 2cf567f421db ("netdevsim: copy addresses for both in and out paths")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 87e0a94e60ea2e29be9dec6bc146fbc9861a4055 ]
The struct xfrm_state_offload has all fields needed to hold information
for offloaded policies too. In order to do not create new struct with
same fields, let's rename existing one and reuse it later.
Reviewed-by: Raed Salem <raeds@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Stable-dep-of: 2cf567f421db ("netdevsim: copy addresses for both in and out paths")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 3f0ab59e6537c6a8f9e1b355b48f9c05a76e8563 ]
This expands the validation introduced in commit 07bf7908950a ("xfrm:
Validate address prefix lengths in the xfrm selector.")
syzbot created an SA with
usersa.sel.family = AF_UNSPEC
usersa.sel.prefixlen_s = 128
usersa.family = AF_INET
Because of the AF_UNSPEC selector, verify_newsa_info doesn't put
limits on prefixlen_{s,d}. But then copy_from_user_state sets
x->sel.family to usersa.family (AF_INET). Do the same conversion in
verify_newsa_info before validating prefixlen_{s,d}, since that's how
prefixlen is going to be used later on.
Reported-by: syzbot+cc39f136925517aed571@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Signed-off-by: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Signed-off-by: Antony Antony <antony.antony@secunet.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 1a807e46aa93ebad1dfbed4f82dc3bf779423a6e upstream.
After a couple recent changes in LLVM, there is a warning (or error with
CONFIG_WERROR=y or W=e) from the compile time fortify source routines,
specifically the memset() in copy_to_user_tmpl().
In file included from net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c:14:
...
include/linux/fortify-string.h:438:4: error: call to '__write_overflow_field' declared with 'warning' attribute: detected write beyond size of field (1st parameter); maybe use struct_group()? [-Werror,-Wattribute-warning]
438 | __write_overflow_field(p_size_field, size);
| ^
1 error generated.
While ->xfrm_nr has been validated against XFRM_MAX_DEPTH when its value
is first assigned in copy_templates() by calling validate_tmpl() first
(so there should not be any issue in practice), LLVM/clang cannot really
deduce that across the boundaries of these functions. Without that
knowledge, it cannot assume that the loop stops before i is greater than
XFRM_MAX_DEPTH, which would indeed result a stack buffer overflow in the
memset().
To make the bounds of ->xfrm_nr clear to the compiler and add additional
defense in case copy_to_user_tmpl() is ever used in a path where
->xfrm_nr has not been properly validated against XFRM_MAX_DEPTH first,
add an explicit bound check and early return, which clears up the
warning.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1985
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
