[ Upstream commit 184cefbe62627730c30282df12bcff9aae4816ea ]
Instead of trusting that struct file_lock returns completely unchanged
after vfs_test_lock() when there's no conflicting lock, stash away our
nlm_lockowner reference so we can properly release it for all cases.
This defends against another file_lock implementation overwriting fl_owner
when the return type is F_UNLCK.
Reported-by: Roberto Bergantinos Corpas <rbergant@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Roberto Bergantinos Corpas <rbergant@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 40595cdc93edf4110c0f0c0b06f8d82008f23929 ]
NFSv4.1 supports an optional lock notification feature which notifies
the client when a lock comes available. (Normally NFSv4 clients just
poll for locks if necessary.) To make that work, we need to request a
blocking lock from the filesystem.
We turned that off for NFS in commit f657f8eef3ff ("nfs: don't atempt
blocking locks on nfs reexports") [sic] because it actually blocks the
nfsd thread while waiting for the lock.
Thanks to Vasily Averin for pointing out that NFS isn't the only
filesystem with that problem.
Any filesystem that leaves ->lock NULL will use posix_lock_file(), which
does the right thing. Simplest is just to assume that any filesystem
that defines its own ->lock is not safe to request a blocking lock from.
So, this patch mostly reverts commit f657f8eef3ff ("nfs: don't atempt
blocking locks on nfs reexports") [sic] and commit b840be2f00c0 ("lockd:
don't attempt blocking locks on nfs reexports"), and instead uses a
check of ->lock (Vasily's suggestion) to decide whether to support
blocking lock notifications on a given filesystem. Also add a little
documentation.
Perhaps someday we could add back an export flag later to allow
filesystems with "good" ->lock methods to support blocking lock
notifications.
Reported-by: Vasily Averin <vvs@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
[ cel: Description rewritten to address checkpatch nits ]
[ cel: Fixed warning when SUNRPC debugging is disabled ]
[ cel: Fixed NULL check ]
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Vasily Averin <vvs@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit b840be2f00c0bc00d993f8f76e251052b83e4382 ]
As in the v4 case, it doesn't work well to block waiting for a lock on
an nfs filesystem.
As in the v4 case, that means we're depending on the client to poll.
It's probably incorrect to depend on that, but I *think* clients do poll
in practice. In any case, it's an improvement over hanging the lockd
thread indefinitely as we currently are.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 7f024fcd5c97dc70bb9121c80407cf3cf9be7159 ]
We shouldn't really be using a read-only file descriptor to take a write
lock.
Most filesystems will put up with it. But NFS, for example, won't.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit a81041b7d8f08c4e1014173c5483a0f18724a576 ]
Make this lookup slightly more concise, and prepare for changing how we
look this up in a following patch.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
