[ Upstream commit d03376c185926098cb4d668d6458801eb785c0a5 ]
This reverts 19f8def031bfa50c579149b200bfeeb919727b27
"Bluetooth: Fix auth_complete_evt for legacy units" which seems to be
working around a bug on a broken controller rather then any limitation
imposed by the Bluetooth spec, in fact if there ws not possible to
re-auth the command shall fail not succeed.
Fixes: 19f8def031bf ("Bluetooth: Fix auth_complete_evt for legacy units")
Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 99e67d46e5ff3c7c901af6009edec72d3d363be8 upstream.
Before setting HCI_INQUIRY bit check if HCI_OP_INQUIRY was really sent
otherwise the controller maybe be generating invalid events or, more
likely, it is a result of fuzzing tools attempting to test the right
behavior of the stack when unexpected events are generated.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218151
Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit b541260615f601ae1b5d6d0cc54e790de706303b ]
memcmp is not consider safe to use with cryptographic secrets:
'Do not use memcmp() to compare security critical data, such as
cryptographic secrets, because the required CPU time depends on the
number of equal bytes.'
While usage of memcmp for ZERO_KEY may not be considered a security
critical data, it can lead to more usage of memcmp with pairing keys
which could introduce more security problems.
Fixes: 455c2ff0a558 ("Bluetooth: Fix BR/EDR out-of-band pairing with only initiator data")
Fixes: 33155c4aae52 ("Bluetooth: hci_event: Ignore NULL link key")
Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 9d1a3c74746428102d55371fbf74b484733937d9 upstream.
bacmp() is a wrapper around memcpy(), which contain compile-time
checks for buffer overflow. Since the hci_conn_request_evt() also calls
bt_dev_dbg() with an implicit NULL pointer check, the compiler is now
aware of a case where 'hdev' is NULL and treats this as meaning that
zero bytes are available:
In file included from net/bluetooth/hci_event.c:32:
In function 'bacmp',
inlined from 'hci_conn_request_evt' at net/bluetooth/hci_event.c:3276:7:
include/net/bluetooth/bluetooth.h:364:16: error: 'memcmp' specified bound 6 exceeds source size 0 [-Werror=stringop-overread]
364 | return memcmp(ba1, ba2, sizeof(bdaddr_t));
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Add another NULL pointer check before the bacmp() to ensure the compiler
understands the code flow enough to not warn about it. Since the patch
that introduced the warning is marked for stable backports, this one
should also go that way to avoid introducing build regressions.
Fixes: 1ffc6f8cc332 ("Bluetooth: Reject connection with the device which has same BD_ADDR")
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: "Lee, Chun-Yi" <jlee@suse.com>
Cc: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
Cc: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 35d91d95a0cd61ebb90e0246dc917fd25e519b8c upstream.
This fixes the following code style problem:
ERROR: that open brace { should be on the previous line
+ if (!bacmp(&hdev->bdaddr, &ev->bdaddr))
+ {
Fixes: 1ffc6f8cc332 ("Bluetooth: Reject connection with the device which has same BD_ADDR")
Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit c7f59461f5a78994613afc112cdd73688aef9076 upstream.
Syzbot reports a warning as follows:
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 26946 at net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c:619
hci_conn_timeout+0x122/0x210 net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c:619
...
Call Trace:
<TASK>
process_one_work+0x884/0x15c0 kernel/workqueue.c:2630
process_scheduled_works kernel/workqueue.c:2703 [inline]
worker_thread+0x8b9/0x1290 kernel/workqueue.c:2784
kthread+0x33c/0x440 kernel/kthread.c:388
ret_from_fork+0x45/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147
ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:304
</TASK>
It is because the HCI_EV_SIMPLE_PAIR_COMPLETE event handler drops
hci_conn directly without check Simple Pairing whether be enabled. But
the Simple Pairing process can only be used if both sides have the
support enabled in the host stack.
Add hci_conn_ssp_enabled() for hci_conn in HCI_EV_IO_CAPA_REQUEST and
HCI_EV_SIMPLE_PAIR_COMPLETE event handlers to fix the problem.
Fixes: 0493684ed239 ("[Bluetooth] Disable disconnect timer during Simple Pairing")
Signed-off-by: Ziyang Xuan <william.xuanziyang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 1ffc6f8cc33268731fcf9629fc4438f6db1191fc upstream.
This change is used to relieve CVE-2020-26555. The description of
the CVE:
Bluetooth legacy BR/EDR PIN code pairing in Bluetooth Core Specification
1.0B through 5.2 may permit an unauthenticated nearby device to spoof
the BD_ADDR of the peer device to complete pairing without knowledge
of the PIN. [1]
The detail of this attack is in IEEE paper:
BlueMirror: Reflections on Bluetooth Pairing and Provisioning Protocols
[2]
It's a reflection attack. The paper mentioned that attacker can induce
the attacked target to generate null link key (zero key) without PIN
code. In BR/EDR, the key generation is actually handled in the controller
which is below HCI.
A condition of this attack is that attacker should change the
BR_ADDR of his hacking device (Host B) to equal to the BR_ADDR with
the target device being attacked (Host A).
Thus, we reject the connection with device which has same BD_ADDR
both on HCI_Create_Connection and HCI_Connection_Request to prevent
the attack. A similar implementation also shows in btstack project.
[3][4]
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-26555 [1]
Link: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9474325/authors#authors [2]
Link: https://github.com/bluekitchen/btstack/blob/master/src/hci.c#L3523 [3]
Link: https://github.com/bluekitchen/btstack/blob/master/src/hci.c#L7297 [4]
Signed-off-by: Lee, Chun-Yi <jlee@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 33155c4aae5260475def6f7438e4e35564f4f3ba upstream.
This change is used to relieve CVE-2020-26555. The description of the
CVE:
Bluetooth legacy BR/EDR PIN code pairing in Bluetooth Core Specification
1.0B through 5.2 may permit an unauthenticated nearby device to spoof
the BD_ADDR of the peer device to complete pairing without knowledge
of the PIN. [1]
The detail of this attack is in IEEE paper:
BlueMirror: Reflections on Bluetooth Pairing and Provisioning Protocols
[2]
It's a reflection attack. The paper mentioned that attacker can induce
the attacked target to generate null link key (zero key) without PIN
code. In BR/EDR, the key generation is actually handled in the controller
which is below HCI.
Thus, we can ignore null link key in the handler of "Link Key Notification
event" to relieve the attack. A similar implementation also shows in
btstack project. [3]
v3: Drop the connection when null link key be detected.
v2:
- Used Link: tag instead of Closes:
- Used bt_dev_dbg instead of BT_DBG
- Added Fixes: tag
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 55ed8ca10f35 ("Bluetooth: Implement link key handling for the management interface")
Link: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-26555 [1]
Link: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9474325/authors#authors [2]
Link: https://github.com/bluekitchen/btstack/blob/master/src/hci.c#L3722 [3]
Signed-off-by: Lee, Chun-Yi <jlee@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
