commit 5c178472af247c7b50f962495bb7462ba453b9fb upstream.
This is used in poison.h for poison pointer offset. Based on current
SV39, SV48 and SV57 vm layout, 0xdead000000000000 is a proper value
that is not mappable, this can avoid potentially turning an oops to
an expolit.
Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>
Fixes: fbe934d69eb7 ("RISC-V: Build Infrastructure")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240705170210.3236-1-jszhang@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit a18b14d8886614b3c7d290c4cfc33389822b0535 upstream.
riscv uses the value of TSK_STACK_CANARY to set
stack-protector-guard-offset. With GCC_PLUGIN_RANDSTRUCT enabled, that
value is non-deterministic, and with riscv:allmodconfig often results
in build errors such as
cc1: error: '8120' is not a valid offset in '-mstack-protector-guard-offset='
Enable STACKPROTECTOR_PER_TASK only if GCC_PLUGIN_RANDSTRUCT is disabled
to fix the problem.
Fixes: fea2fed201ee5 ("riscv: Enable per-task stack canaries")
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit fea2fed201ee5647699018a56fbb6a5e8cc053a5 ]
This enables the use of per-task stack canary values if GCC has
support for emitting the stack canary reference relative to the
value of tp, which holds the task struct pointer in the riscv
kernel.
After compare arm64 and x86 implementations, seems arm64's is more
flexible and readable. The key point is how gcc get the offset of
stack_canary from gs/el0_sp.
x86: Use a fix offset from gs, not flexible.
struct fixed_percpu_data {
/*
* GCC hardcodes the stack canary as %gs:40. Since the
* irq_stack is the object at %gs:0, we reserve the bottom
* 48 bytes of the irq stack for the canary.
*/
char gs_base[40]; // :(
unsigned long stack_canary;
};
arm64: Use -mstack-protector-guard-offset & guard-reg
gcc options:
-mstack-protector-guard=sysreg
-mstack-protector-guard-reg=sp_el0
-mstack-protector-guard-offset=xxx
riscv: Use -mstack-protector-guard-offset & guard-reg
gcc options:
-mstack-protector-guard=tls
-mstack-protector-guard-reg=tp
-mstack-protector-guard-offset=xxx
GCC's implementation has been merged:
commit c931e8d5a96463427040b0d11f9c4352ac22b2b0
Author: Cooper Qu <cooper.qu@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Mon Jul 13 16:15:08 2020 +0800
RISC-V: Add support for TLS stack protector canary access
In the end, these codes are inserted by gcc before return:
* 0xffffffe00020b396 <+120>: ld a5,1008(tp) # 0x3f0
* 0xffffffe00020b39a <+124>: xor a5,a5,a4
* 0xffffffe00020b39c <+126>: mv a0,s5
* 0xffffffe00020b39e <+128>: bnez a5,0xffffffe00020b61c <_do_fork+766>
0xffffffe00020b3a2 <+132>: ld ra,136(sp)
0xffffffe00020b3a4 <+134>: ld s0,128(sp)
0xffffffe00020b3a6 <+136>: ld s1,120(sp)
0xffffffe00020b3a8 <+138>: ld s2,112(sp)
0xffffffe00020b3aa <+140>: ld s3,104(sp)
0xffffffe00020b3ac <+142>: ld s4,96(sp)
0xffffffe00020b3ae <+144>: ld s5,88(sp)
0xffffffe00020b3b0 <+146>: ld s6,80(sp)
0xffffffe00020b3b2 <+148>: ld s7,72(sp)
0xffffffe00020b3b4 <+150>: addi sp,sp,144
0xffffffe00020b3b6 <+152>: ret
...
* 0xffffffe00020b61c <+766>: auipc ra,0x7f8
* 0xffffffe00020b620 <+770>: jalr -1764(ra) # 0xffffffe000a02f38 <__stack_chk_fail>
Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Cooper Qu <cooper.qu@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@google.com>
Stable-dep-of: d14fa1fcf69d ("riscv: process: Fix kernel gp leakage")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
