commit 7d410d5efe04e42a6cd959bfe6d59d559fdf8b25 upstream.
When getting a chunk map, at btrfs_get_chunk_map(), we do some sanity
checks to verify we found a chunk map and that map found covers the
logical address the caller passed in. However the messages aren't very
clear in the sense that don't mention the issue is with a chunk map and
one of them prints the 'length' argument as if it were the end offset of
the requested range (while the in the string format we use %llu-%llu
which suggests a range, and the second %llu-%llu is actually a range for
the chunk map). So improve these two details in the error messages.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 5fba5a571858ce2d787fdaf55814e42725bfa895 upstream.
At btrfs_get_chunk_map() we get the extent map for the chunk that contains
the given logical address stored in the 'logical' argument. Then we do
sanity checks to verify the extent map contains the logical address. One
of these checks verifies if the extent map covers a range with an end
offset behind the target logical address - however this check has an
off-by-one error since it will consider an extent map whose start offset
plus its length matches the target logical address as inclusive, while
the fact is that the last byte it covers is behind the target logical
address (by 1).
So fix this condition by using '<=' rather than '<' when comparing the
extent map's "start + length" against the target logical address.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
