[ Upstream commit 3d501dd326fb1c73f1b8206d4c6e1d7b15c07e27 ]
This patch is based on a detailed report and ideas from Yepeng Pan
and Christian Rossow.
ACK seq validation is currently following RFC 5961 5.2 guidelines:
The ACK value is considered acceptable only if
it is in the range of ((SND.UNA - MAX.SND.WND) <= SEG.ACK <=
SND.NXT). All incoming segments whose ACK value doesn't satisfy the
above condition MUST be discarded and an ACK sent back. It needs to
be noted that RFC 793 on page 72 (fifth check) says: "If the ACK is a
duplicate (SEG.ACK < SND.UNA), it can be ignored. If the ACK
acknowledges something not yet sent (SEG.ACK > SND.NXT) then send an
ACK, drop the segment, and return". The "ignored" above implies that
the processing of the incoming data segment continues, which means
the ACK value is treated as acceptable. This mitigation makes the
ACK check more stringent since any ACK < SND.UNA wouldn't be
accepted, instead only ACKs that are in the range ((SND.UNA -
MAX.SND.WND) <= SEG.ACK <= SND.NXT) get through.
This can be refined for new (and possibly spoofed) flows,
by not accepting ACK for bytes that were never sent.
This greatly improves TCP security at a little cost.
I added a Fixes: tag to make sure this patch will reach stable trees,
even if the 'blamed' patch was adhering to the RFC.
tp->bytes_acked was added in linux-4.2
Following packetdrill test (courtesy of Yepeng Pan) shows
the issue at hand:
0 socket(..., SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_TCP) = 3
+0 setsockopt(3, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, [1], 4) = 0
+0 bind(3, ..., ...) = 0
+0 listen(3, 1024) = 0
// ---------------- Handshake ------------------- //
// when window scale is set to 14 the window size can be extended to
// 65535 * (2^14) = 1073725440. Linux would accept an ACK packet
// with ack number in (Server_ISN+1-1073725440. Server_ISN+1)
// ,though this ack number acknowledges some data never
// sent by the server.
+0 < S 0:0(0) win 65535 <mss 1400,nop,wscale 14>
+0 > S. 0:0(0) ack 1 <...>
+0 < . 1:1(0) ack 1 win 65535
+0 accept(3, ..., ...) = 4
// For the established connection, we send an ACK packet,
// the ack packet uses ack number 1 - 1073725300 + 2^32,
// where 2^32 is used to wrap around.
// Note: we used 1073725300 instead of 1073725440 to avoid possible
// edge cases.
// 1 - 1073725300 + 2^32 = 3221241997
// Oops, old kernels happily accept this packet.
+0 < . 1:1001(1000) ack 3221241997 win 65535
// After the kernel fix the following will be replaced by a challenge ACK,
// and prior malicious frame would be dropped.
+0 > . 1:1(0) ack 1001
Fixes: 354e4aa391ed ("tcp: RFC 5961 5.2 Blind Data Injection Attack Mitigation")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Reported-by: Yepeng Pan <yepeng.pan@cispa.de>
Reported-by: Christian Rossow <rossow@cispa.de>
Acked-by: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231205161841.2702925-1-edumazet@google.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit e326578a21414738de45f77badd332fb00bd0f58 ]
For passive TCP Fast Open sockets that had SYN/ACK timeout and did not
send more data in SYN_RECV, upon receiving the final ACK in 3WHS, the
congestion state may awkwardly stay in CA_Loss mode unless the CA state
was undone due to TCP timestamp checks. However, if
tcp_rcv_synrecv_state_fastopen() decides not to undo, then we should
enter CA_Open, because at that point we have received an ACK covering
the retransmitted SYNACKs. Currently, the icsk_ca_state is only set to
CA_Open after we receive an ACK for a data-packet. This is because
tcp_ack does not call tcp_fastretrans_alert (and tcp_process_loss) if
!prior_packets
Note that tcp_process_loss() calls tcp_try_undo_recovery(), so having
tcp_rcv_synrecv_state_fastopen() decide that if we're in CA_Loss we
should call tcp_try_undo_recovery() is consistent with that, and
low risk.
Fixes: dad8cea7add9 ("tcp: fix TFO SYNACK undo to avoid double-timestamp-undo")
Signed-off-by: Aananth V <aananthv@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit d2a0fc372aca561556e765d0a9ec365c7c12f0ad ]
This commit fix wrong RTO timeout when received SACK reneging.
When an ACK arrived pointing to a SACK reneging, tcp_check_sack_reneging()
will rearm the RTO timer for min(1/2*srtt, 10ms) into to the future.
But since the commit 62d9f1a6945b ("tcp: fix TLP timer not set when
CA_STATE changes from DISORDER to OPEN") merged, the tcp_set_xmit_timer()
is moved after tcp_fastretrans_alert()(which do the SACK reneging check),
so the RTO timeout will be overwrited by tcp_set_xmit_timer() with
icsk_rto instead of 1/2*srtt.
Here is a packetdrill script to check this bug:
0 socket(..., SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_TCP) = 3
+0 bind(3, ..., ...) = 0
+0 listen(3, 1) = 0
// simulate srtt to 100ms
+0 < S 0:0(0) win 32792 <mss 1000, sackOK,nop,nop,nop,wscale 7>
+0 > S. 0:0(0) ack 1 <mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK,nop,wscale 7>
+.1 < . 1:1(0) ack 1 win 1024
+0 accept(3, ..., ...) = 4
+0 write(4, ..., 10000) = 10000
+0 > P. 1:10001(10000) ack 1
// inject sack
+.1 < . 1:1(0) ack 1 win 257 <sack 1001:10001,nop,nop>
+0 > . 1:1001(1000) ack 1
// inject sack reneging
+.1 < . 1:1(0) ack 1001 win 257 <sack 9001:10001,nop,nop>
// we expect rto fired in 1/2*srtt (50ms)
+.05 > . 1001:2001(1000) ack 1
This fix remove the FLAG_SET_XMIT_TIMER from ack_flag when
tcp_check_sack_reneging() set RTO timer with 1/2*srtt to avoid
being overwrited later.
Fixes: 62d9f1a6945b ("tcp: fix TLP timer not set when CA_STATE changes from DISORDER to OPEN")
Signed-off-by: Fred Chen <fred.chenchen03@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
Tested-by: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
