commit 7cc47e64d3d69786a2711a4767e26b26ba63d7ed upstream.
We found that after long run, the dirty_data of the bcache device
will have errors. This error cannot be eliminated unless re-register.
We also found that reattach after detach, this error can accumulate.
In bch_sectors_dirty_init(), all inode <= d->id keys will be recounted
again. This is wrong, we only need to count the keys of the current
device.
Fixes: b144e45fc576 ("bcache: make bch_sectors_dirty_init() to be multithreaded")
Signed-off-by: Mingzhe Zou <mingzhe.zou@easystack.cn>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231120052503.6122-6-colyli@suse.de
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 2c7f497ac274a14330208b18f6f734000868ebf9 upstream.
In SHOW(), the variable 'n' is of type 'size_t.' While there is a
conditional check to verify that 'n' is not equal to zero before
executing the 'do_div' macro, concerns arise regarding potential
division by zero error in 64-bit environments.
The concern arises when 'n' is 64 bits in size, greater than zero, and
the lower 32 bits of it are zeros. In such cases, the conditional check
passes because 'n' is non-zero, but the 'do_div' macro casts 'n' to
'uint32_t,' effectively truncating it to its lower 32 bits.
Consequently, the 'n' value becomes zero.
To fix this potential division by zero error and ensure precise
division handling, this commit replaces the 'do_div' macro with
div64_u64(). div64_u64() is designed to work with 64-bit operands,
guaranteeing that division is performed correctly.
This change enhances the robustness of the code, ensuring that division
operations yield accurate results in all scenarios, eliminating the
possibility of division by zero, and improving compatibility across
different 64-bit environments.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
Signed-off-by: Rand Deeb <rand.sec96@gmail.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231120052503.6122-5-colyli@suse.de
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 777967e7e9f6f5f3e153abffb562bffaf4430d26 upstream.
In btree_gc_rewrite_node(), pointer 'n' is not checked after it returns
from btree_gc_rewrite_node(). There is potential possibility that 'n' is
a non NULL ERR_PTR(), referencing such error code is not permitted in
following code. Therefore a return value checking is necessary after 'n'
is back from btree_node_alloc_replacement().
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231120052503.6122-3-colyli@suse.de
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 2faac25d7958c4761bb8cec54adb79f806783ad6 upstream.
We get a kernel crash about "unable to handle kernel paging request":
```dmesg
[368033.032005] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffffffffad9ae4b5
[368033.032007] PGD fc3a0d067 P4D fc3a0d067 PUD fc3a0e063 PMD 8000000fc38000e1
[368033.032012] Oops: 0003 [#1] SMP PTI
[368033.032015] CPU: 23 PID: 55090 Comm: bch_dirtcnt[0] Kdump: loaded Tainted: G OE --------- - - 4.18.0-147.5.1.es8_24.x86_64 #1
[368033.032017] Hardware name: Tsinghua Tongfang THTF Chaoqiang Server/072T6D, BIOS 2.4.3 01/17/2017
[368033.032027] RIP: 0010:native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0x183/0x1d0
[368033.032029] Code: 8b 02 48 85 c0 74 f6 48 89 c1 eb d0 c1 e9 12 83 e0
03 83 e9 01 48 c1 e0 05 48 63 c9 48 05 c0 3d 02 00 48 03 04 cd 60 68 93
ad <48> 89 10 8b 42 08 85 c0 75 09 f3 90 8b 42 08 85 c0 74 f7 48 8b 02
[368033.032031] RSP: 0018:ffffbb48852abe00 EFLAGS: 00010082
[368033.032032] RAX: ffffffffad9ae4b5 RBX: 0000000000000246 RCX: 0000000000003bf3
[368033.032033] RDX: ffff97b0ff8e3dc0 RSI: 0000000000600000 RDI: ffffbb4884743c68
[368033.032034] RBP: 0000000000000001 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 000007ffffffffff
[368033.032035] R10: ffffbb486bb01000 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffffffffc068da70
[368033.032036] R13: 0000000000000003 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
[368033.032038] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff97b0ff8c0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[368033.032039] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[368033.032040] CR2: ffffffffad9ae4b5 CR3: 0000000fc3a0a002 CR4: 00000000003626e0
[368033.032042] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
[368033.032043] bcache: bch_cached_dev_attach() Caching rbd479 as bcache462 on set 8cff3c36-4a76-4242-afaa-7630206bc70b
[368033.032045] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
[368033.032046] Call Trace:
[368033.032054] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x32/0x40
[368033.032061] __wake_up_common_lock+0x63/0xc0
[368033.032073] ? bch_ptr_invalid+0x10/0x10 [bcache]
[368033.033502] bch_dirty_init_thread+0x14c/0x160 [bcache]
[368033.033511] ? read_dirty_submit+0x60/0x60 [bcache]
[368033.033516] kthread+0x112/0x130
[368033.033520] ? kthread_flush_work_fn+0x10/0x10
[368033.034505] ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
```
The crash occurred when call wake_up(&state->wait), and then we want
to look at the value in the state. However, bch_sectors_dirty_init()
is not found in the stack of any task. Since state is allocated on
the stack, we guess that bch_sectors_dirty_init() has exited, causing
bch_dirty_init_thread() to be unable to handle kernel paging request.
In order to verify this idea, we added some printing information during
wake_up(&state->wait). We find that "wake up" is printed twice, however
we only expect the last thread to wake up once.
```dmesg
[ 994.641004] alcache: bch_dirty_init_thread() wake up
[ 994.641018] alcache: bch_dirty_init_thread() wake up
[ 994.641523] alcache: bch_sectors_dirty_init() init exit
```
There is a race. If bch_sectors_dirty_init() exits after the first wake
up, the second wake up will trigger this bug("unable to handle kernel
paging request").
Proceed as follows:
bch_sectors_dirty_init
kthread_run ==============> bch_dirty_init_thread(bch_dirtcnt[0])
... ...
atomic_inc(&state.started) ...
... ...
atomic_read(&state.enough) ...
... atomic_set(&state->enough, 1)
kthread_run ======================================================> bch_dirty_init_thread(bch_dirtcnt[1])
... atomic_dec_and_test(&state->started) ...
atomic_inc(&state.started) ... ...
... wake_up(&state->wait) ...
atomic_read(&state.enough) atomic_dec_and_test(&state->started)
... ...
wait_event(state.wait, atomic_read(&state.started) == 0) ...
return ...
wake_up(&state->wait)
We believe it is very common to wake up twice if there is no dirty, but
crash is an extremely low probability event. It's hard for us to reproduce
this issue. We attached and detached continuously for a week, with a total
of more than one million attaches and only one crash.
Putting atomic_inc(&state.started) before kthread_run() can avoid waking
up twice.
Fixes: b144e45fc576 ("bcache: make bch_sectors_dirty_init() to be multithreaded")
Signed-off-by: Mingzhe Zou <mingzhe.zou@easystack.cn>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231120052503.6122-8-colyli@suse.de
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit f72f4312d4388376fc8a1f6cf37cb21a0d41758b upstream.
Commit 028ddcac477b ("bcache: Remove unnecessary NULL point check in
node allocations") do the following change inside btree_gc_coalesce(),
31 @@ -1340,7 +1340,7 @@ static int btree_gc_coalesce(
32 memset(new_nodes, 0, sizeof(new_nodes));
33 closure_init_stack(&cl);
34
35 - while (nodes < GC_MERGE_NODES && !IS_ERR_OR_NULL(r[nodes].b))
36 + while (nodes < GC_MERGE_NODES && !IS_ERR(r[nodes].b))
37 keys += r[nodes++].keys;
38
39 blocks = btree_default_blocks(b->c) * 2 / 3;
At line 35 the original r[nodes].b is not always allocatored from
__bch_btree_node_alloc(), and possibly initialized as NULL pointer by
caller of btree_gc_coalesce(). Therefore the change at line 36 is not
correct.
This patch replaces the mistaken IS_ERR() by IS_ERR_OR_NULL() to avoid
potential issue.
Fixes: 028ddcac477b ("bcache: Remove unnecessary NULL point check in node allocations")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 6.5+
Cc: Zheng Wang <zyytlz.wz@163.com>
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231120052503.6122-9-colyli@suse.de
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
