[ Upstream commit ac5887c8e013d6754d36e6d51dc03448ee0b0065 ]
Now that we're using a rw_semaphore we no longer need to indicate if a
lock is blocking or not, nor do we need to flip the entire path from
blocking to spinning. Remove these helpers and all the places they are
called.
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Stable-dep-of: 44f52bbe96df ("btrfs: fix use-after-free when COWing tree bock and tracing is enabled")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 8dcbc26194eb872cc3430550fb70bb461424d267 ]
btrfs_lookup_dir_index_item() and btrfs_lookup_dir_item() lookup for dir
entries and both are used during log replay or when updating a log tree
during an unlink.
However when the dir item does not exists, btrfs_lookup_dir_item() returns
NULL while btrfs_lookup_dir_index_item() returns PTR_ERR(-ENOENT), and if
the dir item exists but there is no matching entry for a given name or
index, both return NULL. This makes the call sites during log replay to
be more verbose than necessary and it makes it easy to miss this slight
difference. Since we don't need to distinguish between those two cases,
make btrfs_lookup_dir_index_item() always return NULL when there is no
matching directory entry - either because there isn't any dir entry or
because there is one but it does not match the given name and index.
Also rename the argument 'objectid' of btrfs_lookup_dir_index_item() to
'index' since it is supposed to match an index number, and the name
'objectid' is not very good because it can easily be confused with an
inode number (like the inode number a dir entry points to).
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit b4c639f699349880b7918b861e1bd360442ec450 ]
Jens reported a compiler warning when using
CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=y that looks like this
fs/btrfs/tree-log.c: In function ‘btrfs_log_prealloc_extents’:
fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:4828:23: warning: ‘start_slot’ may be used
uninitialized [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
4828 | ret = copy_items(trans, inode, dst_path, path,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
4829 | start_slot, ins_nr, 1, 0);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:4725:13: note: ‘start_slot’ was declared here
4725 | int start_slot;
| ^~~~~~~~~~
The compiler is incorrect, as we only use this code when ins_len > 0,
and when ins_len > 0 we have start_slot properly initialized. However
we generally find the -Wmaybe-uninitialized warnings valuable, so
initialize start_slot to get rid of the warning.
Reported-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Tested-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
