[ Upstream commit 6588732445ff19f6183f0fa72ddedf67e5a5be32 ]
MIPS appears to define a RST symbol at a high level, which clashes
with some register naming in the driver. Since there is currently
no case for running this driver on MIPS devices simply cut off the
build of this driver on MIPS.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202311071303.JJMAOjy4-lkp@intel.com/
Suggested-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231115162853.1891940-1-ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 14694179e561b5f2f7e56a0f590e2cb49a9cc7ab ]
Trying to suspend to RAM on SAMA5D27 EVK leads to the following lockdep
warning:
============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
6.7.0-rc5-wt+ #532 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
sh/92 is trying to acquire lock:
c3cf306c (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: __irq_get_desc_lock+0xe8/0x100
but task is already holding lock:
c3d7c46c (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: __irq_get_desc_lock+0xe8/0x100
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(&irq_desc_lock_class);
lock(&irq_desc_lock_class);
*** DEADLOCK ***
May be due to missing lock nesting notation
6 locks held by sh/92:
#0: c3aa0258 (sb_writers#6){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ksys_write+0xd8/0x178
#1: c4c2df44 (&of->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x138/0x284
#2: c32684a0 (kn->active){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x148/0x284
#3: c232b6d4 (system_transition_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: pm_suspend+0x13c/0x4e8
#4: c387b088 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: __device_suspend+0x1e8/0x91c
#5: c3d7c46c (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: __irq_get_desc_lock+0xe8/0x100
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 92 Comm: sh Not tainted 6.7.0-rc5-wt+ #532
Hardware name: Atmel SAMA5
unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x18/0x1c
show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x34/0x48
dump_stack_lvl from __lock_acquire+0x19ec/0x3a0c
__lock_acquire from lock_acquire.part.0+0x124/0x2d0
lock_acquire.part.0 from _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x5c/0x78
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave from __irq_get_desc_lock+0xe8/0x100
__irq_get_desc_lock from irq_set_irq_wake+0xa8/0x204
irq_set_irq_wake from atmel_gpio_irq_set_wake+0x58/0xb4
atmel_gpio_irq_set_wake from irq_set_irq_wake+0x100/0x204
irq_set_irq_wake from gpio_keys_suspend+0xec/0x2b8
gpio_keys_suspend from dpm_run_callback+0xe4/0x248
dpm_run_callback from __device_suspend+0x234/0x91c
__device_suspend from dpm_suspend+0x224/0x43c
dpm_suspend from dpm_suspend_start+0x9c/0xa8
dpm_suspend_start from suspend_devices_and_enter+0x1e0/0xa84
suspend_devices_and_enter from pm_suspend+0x460/0x4e8
pm_suspend from state_store+0x78/0xe4
state_store from kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x1a0/0x284
kernfs_fop_write_iter from vfs_write+0x38c/0x6f4
vfs_write from ksys_write+0xd8/0x178
ksys_write from ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c
Exception stack(0xc52b3fa8 to 0xc52b3ff0)
3fa0: 00000004 005a0ae8 00000001 005a0ae8 00000004 00000001
3fc0: 00000004 005a0ae8 00000001 00000004 00000004 b6c616c0 00000020 0059d190
3fe0: 00000004 b6c61678 aec5a041 aebf1a26
This warning is raised because pinctrl-at91-pio4 uses chained IRQ. Whenever
a wake up source configures an IRQ through irq_set_irq_wake, it will
lock the corresponding IRQ desc, and then call irq_set_irq_wake on "parent"
IRQ which will do the same on its own IRQ desc, but since those two locks
share the same class, lockdep reports this as an issue.
Fix lockdep false positive by setting a different class for parent and
children IRQ
Fixes: 776180848b57 ("pinctrl: introduce driver for Atmel PIO4 controller")
Signed-off-by: Alexis Lothoré <alexis.lothore@bootlin.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231215-lockdep_warning-v1-1-8137b2510ed5@bootlin.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 4198a9b571065978632276264e01d71d68000ac5 upstream.
When in the list_for_each_entry iteration, reload of p->state->settings
with a local setting from old_state will turn the list iteration into an
infinite loop.
The typical symptom when the issue happens, will be a printk message like:
"not freeing pin xx (xxx) as part of deactivating group xxx - it is
already used for some other setting".
This is a compiler-dependent problem, one instance occurred using Clang
version 10.0 on the arm64 architecture with linux version 4.19.
Fixes: 6e5e959dde0d ("pinctrl: API changes to support multiple states per device")
Signed-off-by: Maria Yu <quic_aiquny@quicinc.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231115102824.23727-1-quic_aiquny@quicinc.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit c153a4edff6ab01370fcac8e46f9c89cca1060c2 upstream.
The code in find_pinctrl() takes a mutex and traverses a list of pinctrl
structures. Later the caller bumps up reference count on the found
structure. Such pattern is not safe as pinctrl that was found may get
deleted before the caller gets around to increasing the reference count.
Fix this by taking the reference count in find_pinctrl(), while it still
holds the mutex.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/ZQs1RgTKg6VJqmPs@google.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit f055ff23c331f28aa4ace4b72dc56f63b9a726c8 ]
Enable pin muxing (eg. programmable function), so that the RZ/N1 GPIO
pins will be configured as specified by the pinmux in the DTS.
This used to be enabled implicitly via CONFIG_GENERIC_PINMUX_FUNCTIONS,
however that was removed, since the RZ/N1 driver does not call any of
the generic pinmux functions.
Fixes: 1308fb4e4eae14e6 ("pinctrl: rzn1: Do not select GENERIC_PIN{CTRL_GROUPS,MUX_FUNCTIONS}")
Signed-off-by: Ralph Siemsen <ralph.siemsen@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231004200008.1306798-1-ralph.siemsen@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
