Ensure that a CFS parent will be in the list whenever one of its children is also
in the list.
A warning on rq->tmp_alone_branch != &rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list has been
reported while running LTP test cfs_bandwidth01.
Odin Ugedal found the root cause:
$ tree /sys/fs/cgroup/ltp/ -d --charset=ascii
/sys/fs/cgroup/ltp/
|-- drain
`-- test-6851
`-- level2
|-- level3a
| |-- worker1
| `-- worker2
`-- level3b
`-- worker3
Timeline (ish):
- worker3 gets throttled
- level3b is decayed, since it has no more load
- level2 get throttled
- worker3 get unthrottled
- level2 get unthrottled
- worker3 is added to list
- level3b is not added to list, since nr_running==0 and is decayed
[ Vincent Guittot: Rebased and updated to fix for the reported warning. ]
Fixes: a7b359fc6a37 ("sched/fair: Correctly insert cfs_rq's to list on unthrottle")
Reported-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Suggested-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Odin Ugedal <odin@uged.al>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210621174330.11258-1-vincent.guittot@linaro.org
In case the _avg delta is 0 there is no need to update se's _avg
(level n) nor cfs_rq's _avg (level n-1). These values stay the same.
Since cfs_rq's _avg isn't changed, i.e. no load is propagated down,
cfs_rq's _sum should stay the same as well.
So bail out after se's _sum has been updated.
Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210601083616.804229-1-dietmar.eggemann@arm.com
Fix an issue where fairness is decreased since cfs_rq's can end up not
being decayed properly. For two sibling control groups with the same
priority, this can often lead to a load ratio of 99/1 (!!).
This happens because when a cfs_rq is throttled, all the descendant
cfs_rq's will be removed from the leaf list. When they initial cfs_rq
is unthrottled, it will currently only re add descendant cfs_rq's if
they have one or more entities enqueued. This is not a perfect
heuristic.
Instead, we insert all cfs_rq's that contain one or more enqueued
entities, or it its load is not completely decayed.
Can often lead to situations like this for equally weighted control
groups:
$ ps u -C stress
USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND
root 10009 88.8 0.0 3676 100 pts/1 R+ 11:04 0:13 stress --cpu 1
root 10023 3.0 0.0 3676 104 pts/1 R+ 11:04 0:00 stress --cpu 1
Fixes: 31bc6aeaab1d ("sched/fair: Optimize update_blocked_averages()")
[vingo: !SMP build fix]
Signed-off-by: Odin Ugedal <odin@uged.al>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210612112815.61678-1-odin@uged.al
Rounding in PELT calculation happening when entities are attached/detached
of a cfs_rq can result into situations where util/runnable_avg is not null
but util/runnable_sum is. This is normally not possible so we need to
ensure that util/runnable_sum stays synced with util/runnable_avg.
detach_entity_load_avg() is the last place where we don't sync
util/runnable_sum with util/runnbale_avg when moving some sched_entities
Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210601085832.12626-1-vincent.guittot@linaro.org
when removing a cfs_rq from the list we only check _sum value so we must
ensure that _avg and _sum stay synced so load_sum can't be null whereas
load_avg is not after propagating load in the cgroup hierarchy.
Use load_avg to compute load_sum similarly to what is done for util_sum
and runnable_sum.
Fixes: 0e2d2aaaae52 ("sched/fair: Rewrite PELT migration propagation")
Reported-by: Odin Ugedal <odin@uged.al>
Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Odin Ugedal <odin@uged.al>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210527122916.27683-2-vincent.guittot@linaro.org
The try_to_wake_up function has an optimization where it can queue
a task for wakeup on its previous CPU, if the task is still in the
middle of going to sleep inside schedule().
Once schedule() re-enables IRQs, the task will be woken up with an
IPI, and placed back on the runqueue.
If we have such a wakeup pending, there is no need to search other
CPUs for runnable tasks. Just skip (or bail out early from) newidle
balancing, and run the just woken up task.
For a memcache like workload test, this reduces total CPU use by
about 2%, proportionally split between user and system time,
and p99 and p95 application response time by 10% on average.
The schedstats run_delay number shows a similar improvement.
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210422130236.0bb353df@imladris.surriel.com
During load-balance, groups classified as group_misfit_task are filtered
out if they do not pass
group_smaller_max_cpu_capacity(<candidate group>, <local group>);
which itself employs fits_capacity() to compare the sgc->max_capacity of
both groups.
Due to the underlying margin, fits_capacity(X, 1024) will return false for
any X > 819. Tough luck, the capacity_orig's on e.g. the Pixel 4 are
{261, 871, 1024}. If a CPU-bound task ends up on one of those "medium"
CPUs, misfit migration will never intentionally upmigrate it to a CPU of
higher capacity due to the aforementioned margin.
One may argue the 20% margin of fits_capacity() is excessive in the advent
of counter-enhanced load tracking (APERF/MPERF, AMUs), but one point here
is that fits_capacity() is meant to compare a utilization value to a
capacity value, whereas here it is being used to compare two capacity
values. As CPU capacity and task utilization have different dynamics, a
sensible approach here would be to add a new helper dedicated to comparing
CPU capacities.
Also note that comparing capacity extrema of local and source sched_group's
doesn't make much sense when at the day of the day the imbalance will be
pulled by a known env->dst_cpu, whose capacity can be anywhere within the
local group's capacity extrema.
While at it, replace group_smaller_{min, max}_cpu_capacity() with
comparisons of the source group's min/max capacity and the destination
CPU's capacity.
Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Lingutla Chandrasekhar <clingutla@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210407220628.3798191-4-valentin.schneider@arm.com
When triggering an active load balance, sd->nr_balance_failed is set to
such a value that any further can_migrate_task() using said sd will ignore
the output of task_hot().
This behaviour makes sense, as active load balance intentionally preempts a
rq's running task to migrate it right away, but this asynchronous write is
a bit shoddy, as the stopper thread might run active_load_balance_cpu_stop
before the sd->nr_balance_failed write either becomes visible to the
stopper's CPU or even happens on the CPU that appended the stopper work.
Add a struct lb_env flag to denote active balancing, and use it in
can_migrate_task(). Remove the sd->nr_balance_failed write that served the
same purpose. Cleanup the LBF_DST_PINNED active balance special case.
Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210407220628.3798191-3-valentin.schneider@arm.com
A long-tail load balance cost is observed on the newly idle path,
this is caused by a race window between the first nr_running check
of the busiest runqueue and its nr_running recheck in detach_tasks.
Before the busiest runqueue is locked, the tasks on the busiest
runqueue could be pulled by other CPUs and nr_running of the busiest
runqueu becomes 1 or even 0 if the running task becomes idle, this
causes detach_tasks breaks with LBF_ALL_PINNED flag set, and triggers
load_balance redo at the same sched_domain level.
In order to find the new busiest sched_group and CPU, load balance will
recompute and update the various load statistics, which eventually leads
to the long-tail load balance cost.
This patch clears LBF_ALL_PINNED flag for this race condition, and hence
reduces the long-tail cost of newly idle balance.
Signed-off-by: Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1614154549-116078-1-git-send-email-aubrey.li@intel.com
update_idle_core() is only done for the case of sched_smt_present.
but test_idle_cores() is done for all machines even those without
SMT.
This can contribute to up 8%+ hackbench performance loss on a
machine like kunpeng 920 which has no SMT. This patch removes the
redundant test_idle_cores() for !SMT machines.
Hackbench is ran with -g {2..14}, for each g it is ran 10 times to get
an average.
$ numactl -N 0 hackbench -p -T -l 20000 -g $1
The below is the result of hackbench w/ and w/o this patch:
g= 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
w/o: 1.8151 3.8499 5.5142 7.2491 9.0340 10.7345 12.0929
w/ : 1.8428 3.7436 5.4501 6.9522 8.2882 9.9535 11.3367
+4.1% +8.3% +7.3% +6.3%
Signed-off-by: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210320221432.924-1-song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com
Reorder the tests and skip useless ones when no load balance has been
performed and rq lock has not been released.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210224133007.28644-6-vincent.guittot@linaro.org
These are used in Android.
Promote these to disable CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG.
Signed-off-by: Park Ju Hyung <qkrwngud825@gmail.com>
[0ctobot: Adapted for 4.19]
Signed-off-by: Adam W. Willis <return.of.octobot@gmail.com>
Change-Id: I8053176882e155926769939de15da375e7d548a0
[ Upstream commit ff47a0acfcce309cf9e175149c75614491953c8f ]
Commit b2a02fc43a1f ("smp: Optimize send_call_function_single_ipi()")
optimizes IPIs to idle CPUs in TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG mode by setting the
TIF_NEED_RESCHED flag in idle task's thread info and relying on
flush_smp_call_function_queue() in idle exit path to run the
call-function. A softirq raised by the call-function is handled shortly
after in do_softirq_post_smp_call_flush() but the TIF_NEED_RESCHED flag
remains set and is only cleared later when schedule_idle() calls
__schedule().
need_resched() check in _nohz_idle_balance() exists to bail out of load
balancing if another task has woken up on the CPU currently in-charge of
idle load balancing which is being processed in SCHED_SOFTIRQ context.
Since the optimization mentioned above overloads the interpretation of
TIF_NEED_RESCHED, check for idle_cpu() before going with the existing
need_resched() check which can catch a genuine task wakeup on an idle
CPU processing SCHED_SOFTIRQ from do_softirq_post_smp_call_flush(), as
well as the case where ksoftirqd needs to be preempted as a result of
new task wakeup or slice expiry.
In case of PREEMPT_RT or threadirqs, although the idle load balancing
may be inhibited in some cases on the ilb CPU, the fact that ksoftirqd
is the only fair task going back to sleep will trigger a newidle balance
on the CPU which will alleviate some imbalance if it exists if idle
balance fails to do so.
Fixes: b2a02fc43a1f ("smp: Optimize send_call_function_single_ipi()")
Signed-off-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241119054432.6405-4-kprateek.nayak@amd.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit efd984c481abb516fab8bafb25bf41fd9397a43c ]
A following patch will trigger NOHZ idle balances as a means to update
nohz.next_balance. Vincent noted that blocked load updates can have
non-negligible overhead, which should be avoided if the intent is to only
update nohz.next_balance.
Add a new NOHZ balance kick flag, NOHZ_NEXT_KICK. Gate NOHZ blocked load
update by the presence of NOHZ_STATS_KICK - currently all NOHZ balance
kicks will have the NOHZ_STATS_KICK flag set, so no change in behaviour is
expected.
Suggested-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210823111700.2842997-2-valentin.schneider@arm.com
Stable-dep-of: ff47a0acfcce ("sched/fair: Check idle_cpu() before need_resched() to detect ilb CPU turning busy")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit c6f886546cb8a38617cdbe755fe50d3acd2463e4 ]
Instead of waking up a random and already idle CPU, we can take advantage
of this_cpu being about to enter idle to run the ILB and update the
blocked load.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210224133007.28644-7-vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Stable-dep-of: ff47a0acfcce ("sched/fair: Check idle_cpu() before need_resched() to detect ilb CPU turning busy")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 7a82e5f52a3506bc35a4dc04d53ad2c9daf82e7f ]
Remove the specific case for handling this_cpu outside for_each_cpu() loop
when running ILB. Instead we use for_each_cpu_wrap() and start with the
next cpu after this_cpu so we will continue to finish with this_cpu.
update_nohz_stats() is now used for this_cpu too and will prevents
unnecessary update. We don't need a special case for handling the update of
nohz.next_balance for this_cpu anymore because it is now handled by the
loop like others.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210224133007.28644-5-vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Stable-dep-of: ff47a0acfcce ("sched/fair: Check idle_cpu() before need_resched() to detect ilb CPU turning busy")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 64f84f273592d17dcdca20244168ad9f525a39c3 ]
idle load balance is the only user of update_nohz_stats and doesn't use
force parameter. Remove it
Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210224133007.28644-4-vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Stable-dep-of: ff47a0acfcce ("sched/fair: Check idle_cpu() before need_resched() to detect ilb CPU turning busy")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 0826530de3cbdc89e60a89e86def94a5f0fc81ca ]
newidle_balance runs with both preempt and irq disabled which prevent
local irq to run during this period. The duration for updating the
blocked load of CPUs varies according to the number of CPU cgroups
with non-decayed load and extends this critical period to an uncontrolled
level.
Remove the update from newidle_balance and trigger a normal ILB that
will take care of the update instead.
This reduces the IRQ latency from O(nr_cgroups * nr_nohz_cpus) to
O(nr_cgroups).
Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210224133007.28644-2-vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Stable-dep-of: ff47a0acfcce ("sched/fair: Check idle_cpu() before need_resched() to detect ilb CPU turning busy")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 3af7524b14198f5159a86692d57a9f28ec9375ce upstream.
Running N CPU-bound tasks on an N CPUs platform:
- with asymmetric CPU capacity
- not being a DynamIq system (i.e. having a PKG level sched domain
without the SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES flag set)
.. might result in a task placement where two tasks run on a big CPU
and none on a little CPU. This placement could be more optimal by
using all CPUs.
Testing platform:
Juno-r2:
- 2 big CPUs (1-2), maximum capacity of 1024
- 4 little CPUs (0,3-5), maximum capacity of 383
Testing workload ([1]):
Spawn 6 CPU-bound tasks. During the first 100ms (step 1), each tasks
is affine to a CPU, except for:
- one little CPU which is left idle.
- one big CPU which has 2 tasks affine.
After the 100ms (step 2), remove the cpumask affinity.
Behavior before the patch:
During step 2, the load balancer running from the idle CPU tags sched
domains as:
- little CPUs: 'group_has_spare'. Cf. group_has_capacity() and
group_is_overloaded(), 3 CPU-bound tasks run on a 4 CPUs
sched-domain, and the idle CPU provides enough spare capacity
regarding the imbalance_pct
- big CPUs: 'group_overloaded'. Indeed, 3 tasks run on a 2 CPUs
sched-domain, so the following path is used:
group_is_overloaded()
\-if (sgs->sum_nr_running <= sgs->group_weight) return true;
The following path which would change the migration type to
'migrate_task' is not taken:
calculate_imbalance()
\-if (env->idle != CPU_NOT_IDLE && env->imbalance == 0)
as the local group has some spare capacity, so the imbalance
is not 0.
The migration type requested is 'migrate_util' and the busiest
runqueue is the big CPU's runqueue having 2 tasks (each having a
utilization of 512). The idle little CPU cannot pull one of these
task as its capacity is too small for the task. The following path
is used:
detach_tasks()
\-case migrate_util:
\-if (util > env->imbalance) goto next;
After the patch:
As the number of failed balancing attempts grows (with
'nr_balance_failed'), progressively make it easier to migrate
a big task to the idling little CPU. A similar mechanism is
used for the 'migrate_load' migration type.
Improvement:
Running the testing workload [1] with the step 2 representing
a ~10s load for a big CPU:
Before patch: ~19.3s
After patch: ~18s (-6.7%)
Similar issue reported at:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230716014125.139577-1-qyousef@layalina.io/
Suggested-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Acked-by: Qais Yousef <qyousef@layalina.io>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231206090043.634697-1-pierre.gondois@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit d329605287020c3d1c3b0dadc63d8208e7251382 upstream.
When a task's weight is being changed, set_load_weight() is called with
@update_load set. As weight changes aren't trivial for the fair class,
set_load_weight() calls fair.c::reweight_task() for fair class tasks.
However, set_load_weight() first tests task_has_idle_policy() on entry and
skips calling reweight_task() for SCHED_IDLE tasks. This is buggy as
SCHED_IDLE tasks are just fair tasks with a very low weight and they would
incorrectly skip load, vlag and position updates.
Fix it by updating reweight_task() to take struct load_weight as idle weight
can't be expressed with prio and making set_load_weight() call
reweight_task() for SCHED_IDLE tasks too when @update_load is set.
Fixes: 9059393e4ec1 ("sched/fair: Use reweight_entity() for set_user_nice()")
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.15+
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240624102331.GI31592@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Scheduler code is very hot and every little optimization counts. Instead
of constantly checking sched_numa_balancing when NUMA is disabled,
compile it out.
Signed-off-by: Sultan Alsawaf <sultan@kerneltoast.com>
A significant portion of __calc_delta() time is spent in the loop
shifting a u64 by 32 bits. Use `fls` instead of iterating.
This is ~7x faster on benchmarks.
The generic `fls` implementation (`generic_fls`) is still ~4x faster
than the loop.
Architectures that have a better implementation will make use of it. For
example, on x86 we get an additional factor 2 in speed without dedicated
implementation.
On GCC, the asm versions of `fls` are about the same speed as the
builtin. On Clang, the versions that use fls are more than twice as
slow as the builtin. This is because the way the `fls` function is
written, clang puts the value in memory:
https://godbolt.org/z/EfMbYe. This bug is filed at
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?idI406.
```
name cpu/op
BM_Calc<__calc_delta_loop> 9.57ms Â=B112%
BM_Calc<__calc_delta_generic_fls> 2.36ms Â=B113%
BM_Calc<__calc_delta_asm_fls> 2.45ms Â=B113%
BM_Calc<__calc_delta_asm_fls_nomem> 1.66ms Â=B112%
BM_Calc<__calc_delta_asm_fls64> 2.46ms Â=B113%
BM_Calc<__calc_delta_asm_fls64_nomem> 1.34ms Â=B115%
BM_Calc<__calc_delta_builtin> 1.32ms Â=B111%
```
Signed-off-by: Clement Courbet <courbet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Josh Don <joshdon@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210303224653.2579656-1-joshdon@google.com
Limiting CPU capacity updates, which are quite cheap, results in worse
balancing decisions during opportunistic balancing (e.g., SD_BALANCE_WAKE).
This causes opportunistic placement decisions to be skewed using stale CPU
capacity data, and when a CPU isn't idling much, its capacity suffers from
even more staleness since the only exception to the 100 ms capacity update
ratelimit is a CPU exiting idle.
Since the capacity updates are cheap, always do it when load balancing in
order to improve opportunistic task placement decisions.
Change-Id: If1d451ce742fd093010057e31e71012d47fad70a
Signed-off-by: Sultan Alsawaf <sultan@kerneltoast.com>
