Commit graph

3 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
DelphineCCChiu
b502ac4600 net/ncsi: Fix the multi thread manner of NCSI driver
[ Upstream commit e85e271dec0270982afed84f70dc37703fcc1d52 ]

Currently NCSI driver will send several NCSI commands back to back without
waiting the response of previous NCSI command or timeout in some state
when NIC have multi channel. This operation against the single thread
manner defined by NCSI SPEC(section 6.3.2.3 in DSP0222_1.1.1)

According to NCSI SPEC(section 6.2.13.1 in DSP0222_1.1.1), we should probe
one channel at a time by sending NCSI commands (Clear initial state, Get
version ID, Get capabilities...), than repeat this steps until the max
number of channels which we got from NCSI command (Get capabilities) has
been probed.

Fixes: e6f44ed6d04d ("net/ncsi: Package and channel management")
Signed-off-by: DelphineCCChiu <delphine_cc_chiu@wiwynn.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240529065856.825241-1-delphine_cc_chiu@wiwynn.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2024-11-19 14:19:00 +01:00
Peter Delevoryas
1763b6665f net/ncsi: Fix netlink major/minor version numbers
[ Upstream commit 3084b58bfd0b9e4b5e034f31f31b42977db35f12 ]

The netlink interface for major and minor version numbers doesn't actually
return the major and minor version numbers.

It reports a u32 that contains the (major, minor, update, alpha1)
components as the major version number, and then alpha2 as the minor
version number.

For whatever reason, the u32 byte order was reversed (ntohl): maybe it was
assumed that the encoded value was a single big-endian u32, and alpha2 was
the minor version.

The correct way to get the supported NC-SI version from the network
controller is to parse the Get Version ID response as described in 8.4.44
of the NC-SI spec[1].

    Get Version ID Response Packet Format

              Bits
            +--------+--------+--------+--------+
     Bytes  | 31..24 | 23..16 | 15..8  | 7..0   |
    +-------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
    | 0..15 | NC-SI Header                      |
    +-------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
    | 16..19| Response code   | Reason code     |
    +-------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
    |20..23 | Major  | Minor  | Update | Alpha1 |
    +-------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
    |24..27 |         reserved         | Alpha2 |
    +-------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
    |            .... other stuff ....          |

The major, minor, and update fields are all binary-coded decimal (BCD)
encoded [2]. The spec provides examples below the Get Version ID response
format in section 8.4.44.1, but for practical purposes, this is an example
from a live network card:

    root@bmc:~# ncsi-util 0x15
    NC-SI Command Response:
    cmd: GET_VERSION_ID(0x15)
    Response: COMMAND_COMPLETED(0x0000)  Reason: NO_ERROR(0x0000)
    Payload length = 40

    20: 0xf1 0xf1 0xf0 0x00 <<<<<<<<< (major, minor, update, alpha1)
    24: 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 <<<<<<<<< (_, _, _, alpha2)

    28: 0x6d 0x6c 0x78 0x30
    32: 0x2e 0x31 0x00 0x00
    36: 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00
    40: 0x16 0x1d 0x07 0xd2
    44: 0x10 0x1d 0x15 0xb3
    48: 0x00 0x17 0x15 0xb3
    52: 0x00 0x00 0x81 0x19

This should be parsed as "1.1.0".

"f" in the upper-nibble means to ignore it, contributing zero.

If both nibbles are "f", I think the whole field is supposed to be ignored.
Major and minor are "required", meaning they're not supposed to be "ff",
but the update field is "optional" so I think it can be ff. I think the
simplest thing to do is just set the major and minor to zero instead of
juggling some conditional logic or something.

bcd2bin() from "include/linux/bcd.h" seems to assume both nibbles are 0-9,
so I've provided a custom BCD decoding function.

Alpha1 and alpha2 are ISO/IEC 8859-1 encoded, which just means ASCII
characters as far as I can tell, although the full encoding table for
non-alphabetic characters is slightly different (I think).

I imagine the alpha fields are just supposed to be alphabetic characters,
but I haven't seen any network cards actually report a non-zero value for
either.

If people wrote software against this netlink behavior, and were parsing
the major and minor versions themselves from the u32, then this would
definitely break their code.

[1] https://www.dmtf.org/sites/default/files/standards/documents/DSP0222_1.0.0.pdf
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary-coded_decimal
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO/IEC_8859-1

Signed-off-by: Peter Delevoryas <peter@pjd.dev>
Fixes: 138635cc27c9 ("net/ncsi: NCSI response packet handler")
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2024-11-18 12:12:28 +01:00
Gabriel2392
7ed7ee9edf Import A536BXXU9EXDC 2024-06-15 16:02:09 -03:00