[ Upstream commit 11377947b5861fa59bf77c827e1dd7c081842cc9 ]
Currently, if the rcuscale module's async module parameter is specified
for RCU implementations that do not have async primitives such as RCU
Tasks Rude (which now lacks a call_rcu_tasks_rude() function), there
will be a series of splats due to calls to a NULL pointer. This commit
therefore warns of this situation, but switches to non-async testing.
Signed-off-by: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit cc5645fddb0ce28492b15520306d092730dffa48 upstream.
There is a possibility of buffer overflow in
show_rcu_tasks_trace_gp_kthread() if counters, passed
to sprintf() are huge. Counter numbers, needed for this
are unrealistically high, but buffer overflow is still
possible.
Use snprintf() with buffer size instead of sprintf().
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
Fixes: edf3775f0ad6 ("rcu-tasks: Add count for idle tasks on offline CPUs")
Signed-off-by: Nikita Kiryushin <kiryushin@ancud.ru>
Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Vamsi Krishna Brahmajosyula <vamsi-krishna.brahmajosyula@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit 6040072f4774a575fa67b912efe7722874be337b ]
On powerpc systems, spinlock acquisition does not order prior stores
against later loads. This means that this statement:
rfcp->rfc_next = NULL;
Can be reordered to follow this statement:
WRITE_ONCE(*rfcpp, rfcp);
Which is then a data race with rcu_torture_fwd_prog_cr(), specifically,
this statement:
rfcpn = READ_ONCE(rfcp->rfc_next)
KCSAN located this data race, which represents a real failure on powerpc.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Cc: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>
Cc: <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
When there are no callbacks pending on an idle system, I noticed that
RCU softirq is continuously firing. During this the cpu_no_qs is set to
false, and core_needs_qs is set to true indefinitely. This causes
rcu_process_callbacks to be repeatedly called, even though the node
corresponding to the CPU has that CPU's mask bit cleared and the system
is idle. I believe the race is when such mask clearing is done during
idle CPU scan of the quiescent state forcing stage in the kthread
instead of the softirq. Since the rnp mask is cleared, but the flags on
the CPU's rdp are not cleared, the CPU thinks it still needs to report
to core RCU.
Cure this by clearing the core_needs_qs flag when the CPU detects that
its node is already updated which will avoid the unwanted softirq raises
to the benefit of real-time systems.
Test: Ran rcutorture for various tree RCU configs.
Change-Id: Iee374d1dcdc74ecc5e6816a99be51feddd876931
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: mydongistiny <jaysonedson@gmail.com>
[ Upstream commit 8b9b443fa860276822b25057cb3ff3b28734dec0 ]
The "pipe_count > RCU_TORTURE_PIPE_LEN" check has a comment saying "Should
not happen, but...". This is only true when testing an RCU whose grace
periods are always long enough. This commit therefore fixes this comment.
Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=wi7rJ-eGq+xaxVfzFEgbL9tdf6Kc8Z89rCpfcQOKm74Tw@mail.gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit e6c86c513f440bec5f1046539c7e3c6c653842da ]
As an accident of implementation, an RCU Tasks Trace grace period also
acts as an RCU grace period. However, this could change at any time.
This commit therefore creates an rcu_trace_implies_rcu_gp() that currently
returns true to codify this accident. Code relying on this accident
must call this function to verify that this accident is still happening.
Reported-by: Hou Tao <houtao@huaweicloud.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221014113946.965131-2-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Stable-dep-of: 876673364161 ("bpf: Defer the free of inner map when necessary")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
(cherry picked from commit 10108826191ab30388e8ae9d54505a628f78a7ec)
Signed-off-by: Robert Kolchmeyer <rkolchmeyer@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 5f98fd034ca6fd1ab8c91a3488968a0e9caaabf6 upstream.
Since the actual slab freeing is deferred when calling kvfree_rcu(), so
is the kmemleak_free() callback informing kmemleak of the object
deletion. From the perspective of the kvfree_rcu() caller, the object is
freed and it may remove any references to it. Since kmemleak does not
scan RCU internal data storing the pointer, it will report such objects
as leaks during the grace period.
Tell kmemleak to ignore such objects on the kvfree_call_rcu() path. Note
that the tiny RCU implementation does not have such issue since the
objects can be tracked from the rcu_ctrlblk structure.
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Reported-by: Christoph Paasch <cpaasch@apple.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/F903A825-F05F-4B77-A2B5-7356282FBA2C@apple.com/
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Tested-by: Christoph Paasch <cpaasch@apple.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Simultaneously improves interactivity and power efficiency
[Flopster101: This also invalidates any value set by RCU_BOOST_DELAY.]
Signed-off-by: Nahuel Gómez <nahuelgomez329@gmail.com>
