commit f06d1b10cb016d5aaecdb1804fefca025387bd10 upstream.
Olga showed me a case where the client was sending multiple READ_PLUS
calls to the server in parallel, and the server replied
NFS4ERR_OPNOTSUPP to each. The client would fall back to READ for the
first reply, but fail to retry the other calls.
I fix this by removing the test for NFS_CAP_READ_PLUS in
nfs4_read_plus_not_supported(). This allows us to reschedule any
READ_PLUS call that has a NFS4ERR_OPNOTSUPP return value, even after the
capability has been cleared.
Reported-by: Olga Kornievskaia <kolga@netapp.com>
Fixes: c567552612ec ("NFS: Add READ_PLUS data segment support")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.10+
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
Reviewed-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit 251a658bbfceafb4d58c76b77682c8bf7bcfad65 ]
A call to listxattr() with a buffer size = 0 returns the actual
size of the buffer needed for a subsequent call. When size > 0,
nfs4_listxattr() does not return an error because either
generic_listxattr() or nfs4_listxattr_nfs4_label() consumes
exactly all the bytes then size is 0 when calling
nfs4_listxattr_nfs4_user() which then triggers the following
kernel BUG:
[ 99.403778] kernel BUG at mm/usercopy.c:102!
[ 99.404063] Internal error: Oops - BUG: 00000000f2000800 [#1] SMP
[ 99.408463] CPU: 0 PID: 3310 Comm: python3 Not tainted 6.6.0-61.fc40.aarch64 #1
[ 99.415827] Call trace:
[ 99.415985] usercopy_abort+0x70/0xa0
[ 99.416227] __check_heap_object+0x134/0x158
[ 99.416505] check_heap_object+0x150/0x188
[ 99.416696] __check_object_size.part.0+0x78/0x168
[ 99.416886] __check_object_size+0x28/0x40
[ 99.417078] listxattr+0x8c/0x120
[ 99.417252] path_listxattr+0x78/0xe0
[ 99.417476] __arm64_sys_listxattr+0x28/0x40
[ 99.417723] invoke_syscall+0x78/0x100
[ 99.417929] el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x48/0xf0
[ 99.418186] do_el0_svc+0x24/0x38
[ 99.418376] el0_svc+0x3c/0x110
[ 99.418554] el0t_64_sync_handler+0x120/0x130
[ 99.418788] el0t_64_sync+0x194/0x198
[ 99.418994] Code: aa0003e3 d000a3e0 91310000 97f49bdb (d4210000)
Issue is reproduced when generic_listxattr() returns 'system.nfs4_acl',
thus calling lisxattr() with size = 16 will trigger the bug.
Add check on nfs4_listxattr() to return ERANGE error when it is
called with size > 0 and the return value is greater than size.
Fixes: 012a211abd5d ("NFSv4.2: hook in the user extended attribute handlers")
Signed-off-by: Jorge Mora <mora@netapp.com>
Reviewed-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 037e56a22ff37f9a9c2330b66cff55d3d1ff9b90 ]
Once the client has processed the CB_LAYOUTRECALL, but has not yet
successfully returned the layout, the server is supposed to switch to
returning NFS4ERR_RETURNCONFLICT. This patch ensures that we handle
that return value correctly.
Fixes: 183d9e7b112a ("pnfs: rework LAYOUTGET retry handling")
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 5cc7688bae7f0757c39c1d3dfdd827b724061067 ]
If the client is doing pnfs IO and Kerberos is configured and EXCHANGEID
successfully negotiated SP4_MACH_CRED and WRITE/COMMIT are on the
list of state protected operations, then we need to make sure to
choose the DS's rpc_client structure instead of the MDS's one.
Fixes: fb91fb0ee7b2 ("NFS: Move call to nfs4_state_protect_write() to nfs4_write_setup()")
Signed-off-by: Olga Kornievskaia <kolga@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
