Ksawlii/kernel_samsung_a53x
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

jbd2: remove redundant buffer io error checks

Browse source 
[ Upstream commit 214eb5a4d8a2032fb9f0711d1b202eb88ee02920 ]

Now that __jbd2_journal_remove_checkpoint() can detect buffer io error
and mark journal checkpoint error, then we abort the journal later
before updating log tail to ensure the filesystem works consistently.
So we could remove other redundant buffer io error checkes.

Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210610112440.3438139-5-yi.zhang@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Stable-dep-of: e34c8dd238d0 ("jbd2: Fix wrongly judgement for buffer head removing while doing checkpoint")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Zhang Yi 2021-06-10 19:24:36 +08:00 committed by Ksawlii
parent 165f5c8f09
commit 86be467635
1 changed files with 2 additions and 11 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

13
fs/jbd2/checkpoint.c
View file

@ -91,8 +91,7 @@ static int __try_to_free_cp_buf(struct journal_head *jh)
int ret = 0;
struct buffer_head *bh = jh2bh(jh);
if (jh->b_transaction == NULL && !buffer_locked(bh) &&
!buffer_dirty(bh) && !buffer_write_io_error(bh)) {
if (!jh->b_transaction && !buffer_locked(bh) && !buffer_dirty(bh)) {
JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, "remove from checkpoint list");
ret = __jbd2_journal_remove_checkpoint(jh) + 1;
}
@ -228,7 +227,6 @@ int jbd2_log_do_checkpoint(journal_t *journal)
* OK, we need to start writing disk blocks. Take one transaction
* and write it.
*/
result = 0;
spin_lock(&journal->j_list_lock);
if (!journal->j_checkpoint_transactions)
goto out;
@ -295,8 +293,6 @@ restart:
goto restart;
}
if (!buffer_dirty(bh)) {
if (unlikely(buffer_write_io_error(bh)) && !result)
result = -EIO;
BUFFER_TRACE(bh, "remove from checkpoint");
if (__jbd2_journal_remove_checkpoint(jh))
/* The transaction was released; we're done */
@ -356,8 +352,6 @@ restart2:
spin_lock(&journal->j_list_lock);
goto restart2;
}
if (unlikely(buffer_write_io_error(bh)) && !result)
result = -EIO;
/*
* Now in whatever state the buffer currently is, we
@ -369,10 +363,7 @@ restart2:
}
out:
spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
if (result < 0)
jbd2_journal_abort(journal, result);
else
result = jbd2_cleanup_journal_tail(journal);
result = jbd2_cleanup_journal_tail(journal);
return (result < 0) ? result : 0;
}